Popular science books, science documentaries bad?

In summary, popular science books and documentaries can be great for introducing people to science and sparking interest in deep questions and academic study. However, it is important to recognize that these books are not a substitute for education and can sometimes lead to misunderstandings and overconfidence in one's knowledge. It is important to distinguish between good and not-so-good popularizations and to continue expanding one's knowledge through more in-depth topics in math and physics. Ultimately, popular science books and documentaries serve as valuable tools for communicating science to the general public and should not be disregarded.
  • #1
PrincePhoenix
Gold Member
116
2
I went through someone's thread asking regarding a popular science book, a considerable time ago. I got the impression that the more knowledgeable members in the discussion did not approve of most popular science books (if my memory serves me right the point mainly was that it gave people the impression of knowing stuff which they didn't). (As it was some time ago so I do not remember the exact discussion,arguments etc).

So I just want to know what's your view regarding popular science books and documentaries? Good, more bad than good or a fair share of both?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
There are not so many good popular-science books and even less TV documentaries around, but sometimes there are marvelous gems. One of the best popular-science books I've ever read is Leon Lederman, The God Particle. Despites its idiosyncratic title it's a very good description of elementary-particle physics. If you want to know more about the theoretical side, a very good popular book is on this topic is Frank Close, The Infinity Puzzle. Then there is the classic, S. Weinberg, The First Three Minutes on cosmology. It's still worth to read but a bit outdated given the enormous progress of the field in the last 10-20 years (in both theory and observations). A somewhat less easy piece but also supposed to be a popular book is R. Penrose, The Road to Reality. This is very mathematical, but it's fascinating to learn about a very individuel point of view on (mathematical) physics.

I'm from Germany, and thus I cannot say too much about TV documentaries in the US. Everything what's produced by the German TV stations is most of the time very lousy, so that I don't watch them anymore. Some years ago the only thing they had to say about the LHC was that it might be dangerous by creating mini black holes eating up the earth! It's so frustrating!

There is on German/French TV station (ARTE) which produces great documentaries or takes them over from BBC. When lived in the US (Texas) for some years, I loved the science magazine NOVA on my local PBS station.
 
  • #3
I can't comment on books but most science documentaries are truly awful when it comes to explaining things. They usually have artist renderings that look nothing like they should, eg "look at this star being eaten by the black hole" type stuff, and tend to focus on what scientists are doing, for example, "Titan is a fascinating moon. Now, thanks to Planet Ranger 3, we have the opportunity to finally determine whether Titan has oceans." Ok, sure, but WHY IS TITAN FASCINATING? Tell me more about Titan please.

Surely books are a lot better.
 
  • #4
Generally speaking, I think popular science books are great.

Science is so specialised these days that one of the great hurdles we, as scientists, face is communicating the results of our work and well as the value of those results and the potential of future results to the general public, politicians, and those who support our endeavours. The more people know and understand about science - even if it's just superficial or understood by analogy, the better. Popular science books, magazines, websites, and documentaries are really the best avenues for accomplishing that.

Occasionally we see posts from people on these forums who have been heavily influenced by popular science books. They've read something that has generated an interest in some of the deep questions the sceintific community hopes to answer - everything from whether or not faster-that-light travel or time travel is possible, to how a universe came to be presumably, from nothing. Often such questions will be what initially drives them to pursue avenues of academic study.

Sometimes these books can lead to a lay person postulating what to him or her is a new idea, but academically has either been done, or just doesn't fit, or while plausible from an analogy point of view doesn't quite work when you dive into the math. This is, I suspect, where you see the majority of frustration coming from. Some people are just like that - they read one book and all of a sudden, they're an expert.

Getting rid of popular science books won't get rid of that problem.

In fact, it just might make it worse.
 
  • #5
Like everything else, there are good popularizations and not-so-good popularizations.

I think the problem is, as Choppy put it, "Some people are just like that - they read one book and all of a sudden, they're an expert." People don't understand than reading a book on physics doesn't turn one into Einstein, just like reading a book on basketball doesn't turn one into Michael Jordan.
 
  • #6
I think they are good just when you start in physics,but as you dig deeper I find them boring. I'd rather use this time to read some interesting topics in math or physics.
 
  • #7
PrincePhoenix said:
I went through someone's thread asking regarding a popular science book, a considerable time ago. I got the impression that the more knowledgeable members in the discussion did not approve of most popular science books (if my memory serves me right the point mainly was that it gave people the impression of knowing stuff which they didn't). (As it was some time ago so I do not remember the exact discussion,arguments etc).

So I just want to know what's your view regarding popular science books and documentaries? Good, more bad than good or a fair share of both?

The expected or intended audience for the professors in colleges and universities is very different than the audience for the popular documentaries, and books for the common people.
 
  • #8
For some reason, physics on tv is ALWAYS space stuff (lots of black holes, worm holes, dark matter, Star Trek stuff), and maybe quantum stuff, focusing heavily on things like wave-particle duality, the usual quantum weirdness.

They don't seem to talk about angular momentum or fluid dynamics or friction or even e&m.
 
  • #9
Speaking personally, my interest in physics started with popular science books. More specifically, books about cosmology and astrophysics. Cosmos, A Brief History of Time, Quantum Enigma, Universe from Nothing, The Elegant Universe and many others all played a big part in inspiring me to major in physics. Honestly, had I not stumbled across my used copy of Sagan's Cosmos, I doubt I would be majoring in physics today. Reading that book woke something up in me, and presented me with some of the greatest questions and mysteries in existence.

Now that I'm actually a physics major, and I'm formally studying physics, I tend to have little time to read the popular science books. I'm currently reading Kip Thorne's "Black Holes and Time Warps," and thoroughly enjoying it, but it's slow going. I seem to just read a few pages at night before bed, then get too tired to go any farther.
 
  • #10
I don't think they are that bad. I agree with what is mentioned above: they don't go into very much detail and often focus on exotic details. But I still think it's better than not having any accessible information out there. Particularly for people whose science education ended sometime in high school. Outreach and education at all levels is good.

They can be a bit unsatisfying as a trained physicist, but I would be lying if I said I can get more out of a journal article about string theory than I can a popular science book about it. Some subjects are just so far away from what you specialize in that it can be difficult to gain any real insight on them. I will also say that I've really enjoyed a few of the books I read on my own field, but that was because they focussed heavily on the history and progression of the field and less on the scientific details.
 

1. What makes a science book or documentary "popular"?

A popular science book or documentary is one that is written or produced in a way that is accessible to a general audience, without sacrificing accuracy or complexity. It is engaging and interesting, making it appealing to a wide range of people.

2. Are all popular science books and documentaries accurate?

Popular science books and documentaries should strive to be accurate, but there may be some discrepancies or simplifications in order to make the content understandable to a general audience. It is important to fact-check and verify information from any source, including popular science books and documentaries.

3. How are popular science books and documentaries different from academic sources?

Popular science books and documentaries are typically written or produced by science communicators, rather than experts in the field. They may also focus on a more general overview of a scientific topic, rather than delving deeply into specific research or theories.

4. Can popular science books and documentaries be trusted as reliable sources of information?

Popular science books and documentaries can provide a good introduction to a scientific topic, but it is always important to fact-check and verify information from multiple sources. They can be a great starting point for learning about a new subject, but should not be the sole source of information.

5. How can I tell if a popular science book or documentary is good or accurate?

One way to determine if a popular science book or documentary is good or accurate is to look at the credentials of the author or producer. Do they have a background in the topic they are discussing? It is also helpful to read reviews and see if the information presented aligns with what is known in the scientific community.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
5
Views
809
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
3
Views
833
Replies
3
Views
933
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
179
Replies
14
Views
847
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
9
Views
425
Back
Top