Pos/Neg Definite Quadratic: Evaluate 3 Variable q(x,y,z)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the positive or negative definiteness of a quadratic form derived from a matrix, specifically for the function q(x, y, z) = 2x² - 2xy + y² - 8yz – 2xz + 5z². The original poster expresses uncertainty about how to evaluate definiteness in the context of three variables, referencing a two-variable condition from their notes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants suggest various methods for evaluating the quadratic form, including the quadratic formula and testing specific vector values. There is discussion about the implications of eigenvalues for definiteness and the adaptation of definitions from two variables to three variables.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations and approaches. Some guidance has been offered regarding the evaluation of the quadratic form, but there is no explicit consensus on the definiteness of the quadratic expression.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of clarity regarding the definitions of positive and negative definiteness when extending from two variables to three variables. The original poster is uncertain about the applicability of their previous understanding to the current problem.

chrsr34
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Hey guys.
Im having a problem with deciphering positive definite and negative definite for this quadratic form i determined from a matrix.
I don't quite understand how to evaluate if its pos def or neg def.
From what I see in my notes, q(x,y) > 0 for all x not equal to 0. This doesn't help much as with some terms being squared and some not, I am not sure if q will always be positive. I also don't know if there is anything different being a 3-variable quadratic. Anyways here it is:

Homework Statement



q(x, y, z) = 2x² - 2xy + y² - 8yz – 2xz + 5z²

Homework Equations



q(x,y) > 0 for all x not equal to 0

Any help is appreciated
Thanks

Chris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you tried applying the quadratic formula?
 
What does positive definite mean in terms of the eigenvalues of the matrix?
 
Before you do a lot of work, you could also just poke around. If v=(x,y,z)=(1,1,0) then q(v,v)=1. If w=(0,1,1), q(w,w)=(-2).
 
hmm, well what I am not sure of most is the statement "q(x,y) > 0 for all x not equal to 0"
This was given for 2 variables, i have nothing for 3 variables. So in I am not even sure if we are only taking into consideration what x is or if there are 2 variables to take consideration of in 3D. This is the only definition of positive definite i have :frown:
I could do what Dick says by plug and play but I am still not sure if the same definition holds for 3D...
 
For two variables the statement is q(x,y)>0 for (x,y) not equal to (0,0). For three variables the statement is q(x,y,z)>0 for (x,y,z) not equal to (0,0,0). I wrote it the way I did because I usually think of a quadratic form as a function of two vectors, like the dot product.
 
To make Dick's suggestion blatantly obvious, setting x=1,y=1,z=0 yields q(x,y,z)=1 while setting x=0,y=1,z=1 yields q(x,y,z)=-2. What does that tell you regarding the question of the nature of the quadratic form?You can rewrite the expression q(x, y, z) = 2x² - 2xy + y² - 8yz – 2xz + 5z² as the matrix expression

q(\mathbf x)<br /> = \mathbf x\cdot(\mathbf Q \mathbf x)<br /> = \mathbf x^T\mathbf Q \mathbf x

where \mathbf Q is a symmetric matrix and \mathbf x is the column vector

\mathbf x = \bmatrix x\\y\\z\endbmatrix

The first form (\mathbf x\cdot(\mathbf Q \mathbf x)) is apparently how Dick likes to view these forms. I prefer the second form (\mathbf x^T\mathbf Q \mathbf x). It is just a matter of preference; the two expressions are equivalent.
 
I prefer the second form as well. I think of the dot product as \mathbf x^T\mathbf I \mathbf x.
 
Thank you guys. It appears to me that this quad is not pos or neg definite then. This is my 3rd option.
Thanks guys

Chris
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K