Pos/Neg Definite Quadratic: Evaluate 3 Variable q(x,y,z)

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
8 replies · 4K views
chrsr34
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Hey guys.
Im having a problem with deciphering positive definite and negative definite for this quadratic form i determined from a matrix.
I don't quite understand how to evaluate if its pos def or neg def.
From what I see in my notes, q(x,y) > 0 for all x not equal to 0. This doesn't help much as with some terms being squared and some not, I am not sure if q will always be positive. I also don't know if there is anything different being a 3-variable quadratic. Anyways here it is:

Homework Statement



q(x, y, z) = 2x² - 2xy + y² - 8yz – 2xz + 5z²

Homework Equations



q(x,y) > 0 for all x not equal to 0

Any help is appreciated
Thanks

Chris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hmm, well what I am not sure of most is the statement "q(x,y) > 0 for all x not equal to 0"
This was given for 2 variables, i have nothing for 3 variables. So in I am not even sure if we are only taking into consideration what x is or if there are 2 variables to take consideration of in 3D. This is the only definition of positive definite i have :frown:
I could do what Dick says by plug and play but I am still not sure if the same definition holds for 3D...
 
For two variables the statement is q(x,y)>0 for (x,y) not equal to (0,0). For three variables the statement is q(x,y,z)>0 for (x,y,z) not equal to (0,0,0). I wrote it the way I did because I usually think of a quadratic form as a function of two vectors, like the dot product.
 
To make Dick's suggestion blatantly obvious, setting x=1,y=1,z=0 yields q(x,y,z)=1 while setting x=0,y=1,z=1 yields q(x,y,z)=-2. What does that tell you regarding the question of the nature of the quadratic form?You can rewrite the expression q(x, y, z) = 2x² - 2xy + y² - 8yz – 2xz + 5z² as the matrix expression

[tex]q(\mathbf x)<br /> = \mathbf x\cdot(\mathbf Q \mathbf x)<br /> = \mathbf x^T\mathbf Q \mathbf x[/tex]

where [itex]\mathbf Q[/itex] is a symmetric matrix and [itex]\mathbf x[/itex] is the column vector

[tex]\mathbf x = \bmatrix x\\y\\z\endbmatrix[/tex]

The first form ([itex]\mathbf x\cdot(\mathbf Q \mathbf x)[/itex]) is apparently how Dick likes to view these forms. I prefer the second form ([itex]\mathbf x^T\mathbf Q \mathbf x[/itex]). It is just a matter of preference; the two expressions are equivalent.
 
Thank you guys. It appears to me that this quad is not pos or neg definite then. This is my 3rd option.
Thanks guys

Chris