Position of a train engine (Locomotive)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the optimal position for a train engine (locomotive) in relation to its wagons during operation on a route with curves and varying slopes. Participants explore the efficiency of different configurations, including the traditional front placement and the push-pull system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that having the engine at the front is most efficient for visibility and operational control.
  • Another participant argues that trains operate better in tension rather than compression, supporting the idea of a front-mounted engine.
  • There is a question about whether the work done (Force*Length) would remain constant regardless of the engine's position, raising doubts about the necessity of the push-pull configuration.
  • Participants discuss the physical principles of tension and compression, likening the train to a chain that pulls effectively but struggles when pushed.
  • Questions are raised about the rationale behind the push-pull train design, suggesting that it could have been simpler to place the engine at the rear with controls at the front.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the optimal engine placement, with some advocating for the front position due to operational efficiency, while others question the necessity of this configuration and explore alternative designs like push-pull trains. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that their initial analyses may overlook factors such as wagon compression, air resistance, and energy considerations, indicating that further exploration is needed to fully understand the implications of engine placement.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying railway engineering, physics of motion, or transportation systems, as well as individuals curious about the mechanics of train operations.

Maor Hadad
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have a question about where's the most efficient place for a train engine -
Let's say a train has to do a some route back and forth, the route has curves and positive and negative slopes.
In real life - What's the best position for the enginge?

My intuition says it will be most efficient if it will always be in the front -
But when I wrote simple equations I found it doesn't matter -
Because I have neglected many things like compression and streching of the wagons, the air resistance, heat removal and so on.. I'm not sure about it.

Any Ideas?

Thanks/
 
Science news on Phys.org
Well, it does help to see where you're going. Hard to do from the middle or back.
 
Trains work well in tension but poorly in compression, keep the engine at the front.
 
Of course it does :smile:

But speaking in energetic terms - is the work (Force*Length [Joule]) will be the same,
no matter what's the configuration of the engine comparing to the wagons?

If so, why did the 'Push-Pull' train was invented?
Couldn't they just leave the engine in the rear part and add controles to the front?

Thanks
 
Jobrag said:
Trains work well in tension but poorly in compression, keep the engine at the front.

Thank you, Perhaps you can explain what's the 'physical principles' behind that?
 
Maor Hadad said:
Thank you, Perhaps you can explain what's the 'physical principles' behind that?
Think of a train as a length of chain if you pull it the links will follow, if you try to push it the links will bunch up and not control well.
 
Maor Hadad said:
If so, why did the 'Push-Pull' train was invented?
Couldn't they just leave the engine in the rear part and add controles to the front?
Those questions are largely answered in the article you linked...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
18K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
8K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K