Possible Error in Vladimir Arnold Mathematical Methods C

Click For Summary
There is a potential error noted in Vladimir Arnold's "Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics," specifically regarding a problem in chapter 7 on differential forms. The discussion centers on the calculation involving dr^2(r^2=x^2+y^2), where the original claim is that it equals -8, while the reviewer believes it should equal 8. Clarification is provided that the vector involved, ##\xi_2##, is equal to ##-\frac{\partial}{\partial x_1}-\frac{\partial}{\partial x_2}##, which explains the negative sign in the result. The reviewer ultimately resolves the confusion and gains a deeper understanding of differential forms through community input. The thread highlights the importance of precise notation and understanding in mathematical discussions.
xdrgnh
Messages
415
Reaction score
0
I'm reviewing differential forms again and I believe there is an error in Vladimir Arnold's Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics. On page 176 of the hardcover edition of it, in chapter 7, on the section of differential forms, problem 4 he says that dr^2(r^2=x^2+y^2) acting on the 2nd vector in the problem equals -8, I get that is equal 8. I can't understand why there would be a minus sign considering this dr^2, shouldn't it being raised to the 2nd power force the answer to being negative. If anyone can confirm this is not an error I'll be on my way to figuring it out . Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to quote everything that is relevant to your question. You cannot just say page x in y and hope that someone is sitting with their copy of Arnold right in front of them.
 
  • Like
Likes xdrgnh
It is -8, the vector ##\xi_2## on the picture is equal to ##-\frac{\partial}{\partial x_1}-\frac{\partial}{\partial x_2}##.
 
  • Like
Likes xdrgnh
to see this, use that d(r^2) = 2x1dx1 + 2x2dx2, and note that both x1 and x2 are positive on tht vector, but dx1 and dx2 are negative.
 
  • Like
Likes xdrgnh
Thank you all very much, I was able to figure out the correct answer thanks to all of you and learn a bit more about differential forms.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
601
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K