kappcity06 Messages 90 Reaction score 0 Jul 17, 2006 #32 using a^2+b^2=c^2 i found it to be 583.1 or should i use the 500
kappcity06 Messages 90 Reaction score 0 Jul 17, 2006 #34 ok part b is now correct for part c i need to find kentic enery.
sdekivit Messages 91 Reaction score 0 Jul 17, 2006 #35 kappcity06 said: using a^2+b^2=c^2 i found it to be 583.1 or should i use the 500 you mean that the horizontal length is 500 m ? then [tex]F_{N}[/tex] must be recalculated with angle = [tex]tan^{-1} \frac{3} {5}[/tex] the rest is the same. I thought the length of the hill you meant the hypotenuse of the triangle
kappcity06 said: using a^2+b^2=c^2 i found it to be 583.1 or should i use the 500 you mean that the horizontal length is 500 m ? then [tex]F_{N}[/tex] must be recalculated with angle = [tex]tan^{-1} \frac{3} {5}[/tex] the rest is the same. I thought the length of the hill you meant the hypotenuse of the triangle
sdekivit Messages 91 Reaction score 0 Jul 17, 2006 #38 kappcity06 said: i need to work on part c now you get part b now by drawing a triangle and use geometry and the 2 vectors you need to draw from the gravitational force ? --> you now have [tex]E_{friction}[/tex] and you can go on with the energy balance i wrote down in one of my earliest replies.
kappcity06 said: i need to work on part c now you get part b now by drawing a triangle and use geometry and the 2 vectors you need to draw from the gravitational force ? --> you now have [tex]E_{friction}[/tex] and you can go on with the energy balance i wrote down in one of my earliest replies.
kappcity06 Messages 90 Reaction score 0 Jul 17, 2006 #39 i got part c and d thanks to all who hlepd i am really greatful