Potential difference between the parallel metal plates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the potential difference between two parallel metal plates after increasing their separation from 2mm to 1cm, with a fully charged 9V battery initially connected. When the battery is removed, the charge on the plates remains constant, and the capacitance decreases due to the increased distance. The final potential difference is calculated to be 45V, derived from the relationship between capacitance, charge, and voltage, confirming adherence to electrostatic principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics principles, specifically capacitance.
  • Familiarity with the equations E=V/d and C=Q/V.
  • Knowledge of electric field concepts and charge conservation.
  • Basic grasp of the relationship between voltage, charge, and capacitance.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of capacitance in detail, focusing on the formula C = εA/d.
  • Learn about electric fields and their relationship to potential difference.
  • Explore the implications of charge conservation in electrostatic systems.
  • Investigate the effects of varying plate separation on capacitance and voltage.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying electrostatics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the behavior of capacitors in electric fields.

jamesjenson
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two metal plates are placed in parallel, 2mm apart. They are then connected to a fully charged 9V battery. Without discharging the plates, the battery is removed, after which the separation between them is increased to 1 cm. What is the new potential difference between the parallel metal plates?

Homework Equations


E=Vd E= Q/4ε∏r2

The Attempt at a Solution


I have no clue whatsoever, the prof never even went over this, just a hint in the right direction would be apperaited
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ask yourself: with the battery removed, will the potential difference stay constant? Will the charge on each plate (and therefore electric field)?

There are several ways to find potential difference. If potential remains constant, use the one involving that. If electric field remains constant, use the one involving that instead.
 
schaefera said:
Ask yourself: with the battery removed, will the potential difference stay constant? Will the charge on each plate (and therefore electric field)?

There are several ways to find potential difference. If potential remains constant, use the one involving that. If electric field remains constant, use the one involving that instead.

Ok, so if there battery is removed then, and the plates don't touch anything, they would keep their charge, no? So the only change would be the distance between them?
 
jamesjenson said:
Ok, so if there battery is removed then, and the plates don't touch anything, they would keep their charge, no? So the only change would be the distance between them?

Yes, they keep their charge. It might also help to remember E = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}
 
Fluxthroughme said:
Yes, they keep their charge. It might also help to remember E = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}

ok, but doesn't {\sigma} mean Q/A ? and I don't have any info on the area of the plates here
 
jamesjenson said:
ok, but doesn't {\sigma} mean Q/A ? and I don't have any info on the area of the plates here

The point is that the area of the plates doesn't change. So if both Q and A stay the same, so does sigma, and we know \epsilon_0 is a constant.
 
Fluxthroughme said:
The point is that the area of the plates doesn't change. So if both Q and A stay the same, so does sigma, and we know \epsilon_0 is a constant.

ahhh! Ok, I don't see why I didnt see that, thanks!
 
Can we use the concept of capacitance here in this example :

C = eA/d
and
C = Q/V

I think that as "d" would be increased 5 times then "C" would decrease by five times.

As C decreases by 5 times then (since charge "Q" on the plates is conserved) "V" would increase by five times .

Thus (new) V = 45 V

Does that not satisfy all the electrostatics principles ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K