Potential due to infinite sheet

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential \( V(z) \) at a height \( z \) above an infinite sheet with a given surface charge density \( \sigma \). Participants are exploring the implications of integrating over the surface to derive the potential and the relationship between electric fields and potentials in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integral for potential and its convergence issues, questioning the validity of the approach. There are attempts to relate the potential to the electric field derived from the infinite sheet and to clarify the implications of taking the potential at infinity as zero.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the nature of the integral and its implications. Some suggest that the problem may require a different approach to derive the potential, while others are exploring the consequences of the assumptions made regarding the potential at infinity.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted constraint regarding the requirement to obtain the potential through integration over the surface, and participants are questioning the assumptions about the potential at infinity not being specified in the problem statement.

nicksauce
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
1,270
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


Calculate the potential V(z), a height z above an infinite sheet with surface charge density [tex]\sigma[/tex] by integrating over the surface.

Homework Equations


[tex]V(z)=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_s{\frac{\sigma dA}{r}}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


So [tex]V(z)=\frac{\sigma}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{\frac{dx dy}{\sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2}}}[/tex]

However, unless I am wrong, this integral does not converge.
We know the E-field due a infinite sheet is [tex]E=\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0}[/tex], so the potential should be [tex]V=-\frac{z\sigma}{2\epsilon_0}[/tex], right? So where is the error?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're right. This integral doesn't converge... the reason is because V=kq/r takes the voltage at infinity = 0... in other words this integral will give you the voltage at z relativie to z=infinity... since the field is constant, this value will be infinite...

[tex]V=-\frac{z\sigma}{2\epsilon_0}[/tex]

takes the voltage to be 0 at the sheet itself...

Do you have to solve the problem using that particular integral? I don't think it is solvable that way...

Maybe the question wants you to derive the field by integrating over the surface... and then just use V = -integral.dz just like you did?
 
Well the follow up question, is "Use Coulomb's law to calculate the E field above the plane. Compare the electric field to the potential. Why did you get the value you did for the potential?

So it sounds like I'm supposed to get infinity for the potential, and then say it's because the potential at infinity is not zero.

The question specifically says to obtain the potential by integrating over the surface, so I can't think of another way to solve it.
 
nicksauce said:
Well the follow up question, is "Use Coulomb's law to calculate the E field above the plane. Compare the electric field to the potential. Why did you get the value you did for the potential?

So it sounds like I'm supposed to get infinity for the potential, and then say it's because the potential at infinity is not zero.

Rather if the potential at infinity is 0, then the potential at z is infinite... this makes sense because we have a constant field multiplied by an infinite distance... that'll give infinite voltage...

ie [tex]V_z - V_{infinity} = -\int_{\infty}^z \vec{E}\cdot{\vec{dz}}[/tex]

so [tex]V_z - 0 = \frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon}(infinity - z)[/tex]

so Vz is infinite.

The question specifically says to obtain the potential by integrating over the surface, so I can't think of another way to solve it.

Yeah, I guess they just want you to explain why you get that answer... did they specifically ask you to take potential at infinity to be 0?
 
Rather if the potential at infinity is 0, then the potential at z is infinite... this makes sense because we have a constant field multiplied by an infinite distance... that'll give infinite voltage...
Err right... I got mixed up a bit there.

did they specifically ask you to take potential at infinity to be 0?
They did not.
 
Conclusion of the story"potential is found by electric field","electric field of sheet(which is found by gauss` law) is constant"and "gauss` law is totally based upon inverse square dependence of coulomb`s law",which implies that coulomb`s law is not obeyed(as said in gauss` theory).More-over it not possible to experience same force due to electric field just few mm away and meters away from charged sheet.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
787
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
671
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K