Potential Energy and Force Between Capacitor Plates

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the force between capacitor plates, particularly in the context of constant voltage versus constant charge scenarios. Participants explore the implications of these conditions on potential energy and the nature of the force between the plates, debating whether the force is attractive or repulsive.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that when the voltage is constant, pulling the plates apart results in a decrease in stored energy, suggesting a repulsive force.
  • Others clarify that separating the plates at constant voltage allows charges to move, which complicates the energy analysis.
  • One participant notes that if the battery is removed after charging, an attractive force exists, and pulling the plates apart requires energy input to overcome this force.
  • There is a discussion about how capacitance and voltage interact when the plates are separated, with some asserting that this leads to a repulsive force under constant voltage conditions.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the attractive nature of the force is due to opposite charges attracting, questioning the energy considerations presented by others.
  • References to Feynman's lectures are made, suggesting that this topic has been discussed in a broader educational context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the force between the plates is attractive or repulsive under the conditions discussed. Multiple competing views remain, particularly regarding the implications of constant voltage versus constant charge.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the origin of the forces involved and the energy dynamics when the capacitor plates are manipulated. There are unresolved questions about how energy is accounted for in different scenarios.

diza
Hello guys, came across some Analytical Physics lectures (http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/ugrad/227_f11/classes/lect08.pdf) that got me confused.

It is described in the lecture the problem of determining the force between capacitor plates for a constant voltage (ie. connected to a battery). For constant voltage, pulling the plates apart would result in less stored energy in the field, since:

U = CV²/2 = eps*AV²/2d (fixed voltage, parallel plates)

Since the force between the plates is in the direction to reduce the potential energy, this would seem to indicate a repulsive force between the plates (in the direction of increasing d).

This energy-based analysis of the problem seems correct. However, this conflicts with some other sources saying the force is attractive and my intuition that the opposite charges on the two electrodes tend to attract each other.

Can someone guide me in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Separating the plates at constant voltage is different than separating them with constant charge. When the voltage is constant that means charges can enter or leave the two sides the capacitor.
 
MisterX said:
Separating the plates at constant voltage is different than separating them with constant charge. When the voltage is constant that means charges can enter or leave the two sides the capacitor.

I understand that. When you pull plates apart you are actually charging the battery because some of the charge goes back into it. I don't see how this affects the energy-based argument, though.

The force should be in the direction of less potential energy either way, therefore it should be repulsive. However, most textbooks describe this force as attractive (even for constant voltage, variable charge etc).

Also what I don't understand is: what is the origin of this physical force? Coulomb's law says that this force should be attractive unless the plates are both charged at the same polarity.
 
Assume you charge the plates to V and remove the battery.

There is an attractive force between the plates. Now pull the plates apart, which takes energy put into the system to overcome the attractive force.

Q=CV, so what happens to V as C is decreased by pulling the plates apart?

And the energy on the capacitor is E=1/2CV^2, so what happens to the energy of the capacitor when you pull the plates apart with the constant charge on the plates? :smile:
 
berkeman said:
Assume you charge the plates to V and remove the battery.

There is an attractive force between the plates. Now pull the plates apart, which takes energy put into the system to overcome the attractive force.

Q=CV, so what happens to V as C is decreased by pulling the plates apart?

And the energy on the capacitor is E=1/2CV^2, so what happens to the energy of the capacitor when you pull the plates apart with the constant charge on the plates? :smile:

Suppose we are moving the capacitor plates from d->2d.

For fixed charge
U' = Q²2d/εA = 2U
ΔU = 2U - U = U

That seems right. Capacitance goes down. Voltage goes up. And it takes energy put into the system to overcome the attractive force, like you said.

However, if we keep the battery connected, the voltage is fixed and therefore as capacitance goes down, charge goes down as well, and:
U' = εAV²/4d = U/2
ΔU = U/2 - U = -U/2

That would mean the force is repulsive since you took energy from the system to move the plates apart.

However, I still don't understand the origin of this repulsive force and this goes against our intuition that opposite charges attract.

Am I missing something?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
diza said:
However, if we keep the battery connected, the voltage is fixed and therefore as capacitance goes down, charge goes down as well, and:
U' = εAV²/4d = U/2
deltaU = U/2 - U = -U/2

That would mean the force is repulsive since you took energy from the system to move the plates apart.
No, the force is attractive because opposite charges attract. You are not accounting for where the lost energy goes...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K