Potential energy increase of an expanding stellar object

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the energy required to double the radius of a uniformly dense stellar object, expressed in terms of mass and radius. Participants emphasize the importance of demonstrating an effort to solve the problem before seeking help. A link to homework guidelines is provided, highlighting the need for adherence to forum rules. The thread is ultimately closed, indicating that no further responses will be given until the original poster follows the proper procedure. Engaging with the community requires an initial attempt at problem-solving.
Clint0
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How much energy is required to double the radius of a uniformly dense stellar object? Express the answer in terms of mass and the radius of the object.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
:welcome:

Is this your homework?
 
  • Like
Likes docnet
Yes it is.
 
Please repost in the homework forum with an attempt at a solution.

Thread closed.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Energy needed to raise an object to a certain altitude
Replies
7
Views
1K
B Difference Between Potential and Potential Energy
2
Replies
55
Views
4K
I Hamilton’s principle maximises potential energy?
Replies
5
Views
1K
How does gravitational potential energy work?
Replies
27
Views
11K
I Why does the main muscle use the most energy in body movements?
Replies
24
Views
2K
Does Increasing Potential Energy Affect the Gravitational Pull on an Object?
Replies
16
Views
1K
I Potential energy of a pressurized gas canister in space
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Change of coordinates in a potential energy field
Replies
2
Views
1K
I How to interpret this definition of potential energy?
Replies
10
Views
2K
I Tong Dynamics: cannot cancel angle from orbit energy expression calculation
Replies
2
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top