Potential energy of a ball on top of a vertical rod

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a small ball of mass m on a uniform rod of mass m, which is hinged vertically. The task is to determine the velocity required for the ball to complete a full rotation. Participants are discussing the potential energy associated with the system and how it relates to the kinetic energy.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring the potential energy of the system at various points in the motion, particularly when the ball is at the top of the rotation. There are attempts to calculate the center of mass and its effect on potential energy. Some participants are questioning the assumptions made about the system's energy states.

Discussion Status

There is a recognition of differing interpretations regarding the potential energy calculations. Some participants confirm each other's reasoning, while others provide alternative methods for calculating the potential energy of the ball and rod separately. The discussion is ongoing, with no explicit consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of the problem statement and are referencing a textbook for potential energy values. There is a focus on the height gain of the center of mass and the implications for energy calculations.

Vriska
Messages
138
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


The problem is to take a small ball of mass m on a uniform rod of mass m which is hung on a hinge vertically downward, they're asking to find the velocity to be imparted for it undergo a complete rotation.

I have the kinetic energy bit worked out but I'm getting the wrong answer equating it to potential energy

Homework Equations



Cm = x1m1+x2m2/(m1+m2)

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Okay I'll assume the ball system nearly comes to a stop at the when it stands vertically. the cm of the rod will be l/2. this means that the mass is concentrated at l/2. now cm of the total system would be half way between the balland the cm of the rod. So it's l/2 + l/4 which is 3/4l. Mass = 2m so potential energy is lmg3/2.

.The books says this energy is 3mgl

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vriska said:

Homework Statement


The problem is to take a small ball of mass m on a uniform rod of mass m which is hung on a hinge vertically downward, they're asking to find the velocity to be imparted for it undergo a complete rotation.

I have the kinetic energy bit worked out but I'm getting the wrong answer equating it to potential energy

Homework Equations



Cm = x1m1+x2m2/(m1+m2)

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Okay I'll assume the ball system nearly comes to a stop at the when it stands vertically. the cm of the rod will be l/2. this means that the mass is concentrated at l/2. now cm of the total system would be half way between the balland the cm of the rod. So it's l/2 + l/4 which is 3/4l. Mass = 2m so potential energy is lmg3/2.

.The books says this energy is 3mgl
You are right.
 
ehild said:
You are right.

Ah thank you for confirming my suspicions, this problems was a bugger
 
Vriska said:
Okay I'll assume the ball system nearly comes to a stop at the when it stands vertically. the cm of the rod will be l/2. this means that the mass is concentrated at l/2. now cm of the total system would be half way between the balland the cm of the rod. So it's l/2 + l/4 which is 3/4l. Mass = 2m so potential energy is lmg3/2.

The books says this energy is 3mgl

I think the book is right. The cm moves from -3l/4 to +3l/4 a height gain of 3l/2. The mass is 2m so the gain in PE is

2m * g * 3l/2 = 3mgl
 
CWatters said:
I think the book is right. The cm moves from -3l/4 to +3l/4 a height gain of 3l/2. The mass is 2m so the gain in PE is

2m * g * 3l/2 = 3mgl
?! woah, thank you so much for correcting me
 
You can also simply take the ball and the rod separately:

The ball moves upward by ##2l##, so its gain in PE is ##2lmg##.

The COM of the rod is ##l/2## below the hinge, so its gain in PE is ##lmg##.

The total gain in PE, therefore, is ##3lmg##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CWatters

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K