Potential energy of a two-body system

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The potential energy (PE) of a two-body system, consisting of masses m and 2m separated by a distance r, is calculated using the formula U = -G(m1m2)/r, where G is the gravitational constant. The derivation of this formula involves integrating the gravitational force F = G(m1m2)/(r^2) from infinity to r, resulting in U = -G(m1m2)/r. The discussion emphasizes that the gravitational PE is a property of the system as a whole rather than the individual masses. Additionally, when considering comparable masses, the center-of-mass coordinates must be used to accurately determine the potential energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy and its formula.
  • Familiarity with Newton's law of universal gravitation.
  • Basic knowledge of calculus, specifically integration techniques.
  • Concept of reduced mass in two-body systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of gravitational potential energy from first principles.
  • Learn about the concept of reduced mass and its applications in orbital mechanics.
  • Explore the implications of non-inertial frames of reference in gravitational systems.
  • Investigate the effects of adding a third body to a two-body gravitational system.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, astrophysicists, and anyone interested in understanding gravitational interactions and potential energy in multi-body systems.

AlonsoMcLaren
Messages
89
Reaction score
2
If two masses, m and 2m, are separated by a distance r, what is the potential energy of mass m? What is the potential energy of mass 2m? What is the potential energy of the system?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The gravitational PE is a property of the system, not of the individual masses.
 
Doc Al said:
The gravitational PE is a property of the system, not of the individual masses.

So what is the value of PE of the system?
 
AlonsoMcLaren said:
So what is the value of PE of the system?
The gravitational PE of two masses is given by:
U = - \frac{G m_1 m_2}{r}
Where m1 and m2 are the masses and r the distance between them.
 
Doc Al said:
The gravitational PE of two masses is given by:
U = - \frac{G m_1 m_2}{r}
Where m1 and m2 are the masses and r the distance between them.

How to derive it from F=Gm1m2/(r^2)
 
\Delta U = \int_{r_1}^{r_2}\vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r}

In this case, it's easiest to integrate along the radial, and taking potential at infinity to be zero, you get this.

U = \int_{\infty}^{r}G\frac{m_1 m_2}{r^2}dr = -G\frac{m_1 m_2}{r}
 
AlonsoMcLaren said:
How to derive it from F=Gm1m2/(r^2)
In general:
F = - \frac{dU}{dr}
So, to go from F to U, integrate.

(Oops... K^2 beat me to it.)
 
K^2 said:
\Delta U = \int_{r_1}^{r_2}\vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r}

In this case, it's easiest to integrate along the radial, and taking potential at infinity to be zero, you get this.

U = \int_{\infty}^{r}G\frac{m_1 m_2}{r^2}dr = -G\frac{m_1 m_2}{r}

So are you using m1 (or m2) as frame of reference? If so, the frame is non-inertial.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ilyandm
Depends. If m1>>m2, then the acceleration of m1 is negligible, and we can use it as an inertial frame of reference. Or vice versa. But if m1 and m2 are comparable, you are right, and we have to use center-of-mass coordinates. In that case, r is the distance from center of mass, and either m1 or m2 is the reduced mass.

The idea behind reduced mass is that with central potential, which gravity happens to be, instead of looking at two bodies orbiting each other, you can consider bodies one at a time, and treat them as if each orbits the center-of-mass point as if it was immovable point with gravitational attraction. The strength of attraction is determined by reduced mass, which you compute to be sufficient to generate same force as in the original setup.

It's a bit messy, but for two bodies it works fine. Throw in a third body, and it goes from messy to near-impossible.

P.S. Gravitational potential works out to be exactly the same, by the way, so it doesn't matter.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ilyandm

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K