Potential Energy question Confusion on the sign

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the implications of defining direction and height in the context of potential energy and its effect on equations of motion, particularly in relation to an Atwood's machine problem. Participants explore the relationship between potential energy, kinetic energy, and the consistency of direction definitions in physics problems.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether potential energy increases based on their definition of downward as positive, particularly when dropping a mass from a height defined as zero.
  • Another participant asserts that kinetic energy does not depend on the sign definition, as it is always positive.
  • A different participant explains that the formula for potential energy (PE = mgh) is valid only under specific conditions, suggesting that changing the reference point requires a more general form of the potential energy equation.
  • One participant expresses confusion over the changes in potential energy for different masses when the direction is flipped, indicating a lack of understanding of the implications of their coordinate choice.
  • Another participant emphasizes that using a simplified version of the potential energy equation can lead to incorrect answers if the conditions are not met, and suggests that changing directions should not affect the equations of motion, but changing reference frames might.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of defining direction and height for potential energy and equations of motion. There is no consensus on whether the equations of motion should remain the same when changing direction definitions, and confusion persists regarding the application of potential energy equations under different conditions.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the general applicability of potential energy equations and the conditions under which they hold true. There is an acknowledgment of the need for clarity when changing reference frames versus simply changing direction definitions.

vuser88
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Here is my question.

For example if i am standing on top of the empire state building and i define that to be height=0 and i define the downward direction to be positive. if i drop a mass does its potential energy increase based on my definition of direction?

My actual problem was an exam question we were asked to find the equation of motion of atwoods machine using energy conservation.

the way i defined it on the exam is the same way i described it previously. and instead of getting x(dbl dot) = g(m1-m2)/(m1+m2)

i came up with an extra minus sign in front of the g in the numerator...

is this wrong. should the equation of motion come out the same no matter how you define your directions ( as long as you are consistent)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Also does kinetic energy depend on this sign definition

it shouldnt, kinetic energy is always positive...
 
In answer to your first question, the formula [Potential Energy= mgh] only works when you make h= altitude and you ignore all other forces. If you are going to change that, you need to move to a general form of the potential energy equation.

For your second question, KE=\frac{1}{2}mv2, with M≥0, there is no way KE≤0.
 
This dosent make sense to me.

i didn't change the problem i just flipped it b.c it was more convenient i don't understand why its different now.

instead of one Mass 1 PE increasing, it decreases.

and

instead of Mass 2 PE decreasing, it increases.

i don't know anything anymore...
 
The Reason you're getting incorrect answers is that you are using a simplified version of the Potential Energy equation that is only valid under certain conditions. The equation you are probably using for Potential Energy is:
PE=mgh

Where: m= mass , g= acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m/s/s) , h= height off of the ground.


However, that is not a general equation for potential energy. That equation only works if:
a) Height is distance from the ground
b) You are not considering any other forces.

If you chance either one of those (i.e., changing your coordinates so H no longer equals height from the ground), you have to stop using the PE=mgh equation and start using the general equation for Potential Energy, which is detailed here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potential_energy

The general form of the PE equation is considerably more complicated, so it would probably be easier to stick with the PE=mgh form and not to set H=0.


EDIT: Looking back on your original question, I noticed the last part regarding Equations of Motions I didn't see before. I could be mistaken, but I believe equations of motion should be the same if you change directions, but not if you change reference frames, though I am not positive of that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K