Power and Efficiency without mass?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem related to power and efficiency, specifically examining the behavior of a ball in free fall and its energy transformations during bounces. Participants are questioning the role of mass in the calculations and the implications of energy loss during the bounce.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants are exploring whether mass affects the outcome of the problem, while others are questioning the clarity and correctness of the provided solution. There are discussions about the independence of the answer from mass and the implications of energy loss during bounces.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering insights and questioning assumptions. Some have provided clarifications regarding the independence of the solution from mass, while others have pointed out potential shortcomings in the textbook solution, such as the use of units and the timing of numerical substitutions.

Contextual Notes

There are concerns regarding the clarity of the textbook solution, particularly about the use of units and the necessity of calculating energy. Participants are also considering the implications of energy loss after multiple bounces and how that affects the height the ball will reach.

sbrads87
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Possible error in text (has happened before.)
A basketball loses 35% of its kinetic energy when it hits the floor. Initially dropped from a height of 1.2m. How much time will it be in the air between 3rd and 4th bounces?
Relevant Equations
Ek = Eg = mgh = m(9.81)(1.2)

s = v2t-1/2at^2
Really perplexed me as the answer provided does not solve for mass ... seemingly wants to use mass as a unit of height? Or perhaps I'm off base ... really just curious if this is even correct or possible?

Thanks in advance
 

Attachments

  • 20230303_225314.jpg
    20230303_225314.jpg
    32.8 KB · Views: 119
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds okay. Is the answer going to be different depending on the mass of the b-ball ?
 
It is correct. The solution shows that the answer is independent of the mass. Look at it this way. If you drop a mass from height ##h_0##, its mechanical energy before the bounce is ##E_0=mgh_0##. If it loses 35% of that during the bounce, it will have ##KE_1=0.65mgh_0## left in the form of kinetic energy.

Question: To what maximum height ##h_1## will the ball rise?
Answer: $$mgh_1=KE_1=0.65mgh_0\implies h_1=0.65h_0.$$Note that the answer is independent of the mass. If you drop two unequal masses, they will hit the floor at the same time; if in addition they lose the same fraction of energy after the bounce, they will rise to the same maximum height.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
The textbook solution is poor in several ways.

1. It plugs in numbers without units. E.g. we read "##mgh=11.8m##" instead of "##mgh=m\cdot 11.8m^2/s^2##". That may be why you thought it was turning mass into a distance.

2. It plugs in numbers too soon. By leaving g as g it would have cancelled out in the first part, as @kuruman shows in post #4. That makes for less work and greater accuracy.

3. It was never necessary to find an energy. Since after three bounces it will only have ##0.65^3## of its initial energy, we know it will rise to a height of ##1.2\cdot 0.65^3=0.33##m. After that, it is just a matter of finding how long it takes to fall to the ground from that height and doubling it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K