Power dissipation in this circuit

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a circuit schematic that a participant, Dest, is trying to validate. The circuit is intended for a theoretical design in an automotive context, and participants are examining its feasibility, wiring conventions, and the implications of power dissipation within the circuit.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Dest expresses uncertainty about the circuit's correctness and seeks clarification on its functionality.
  • Some participants note that the schematic is drawn unconventionally, making it difficult to interpret the connections, particularly regarding whether components are wired in series or parallel.
  • Concerns are raised about the high current ratings (25A and 450A) mentioned, with participants questioning the practicality of such values for sensors and controllers.
  • One participant highlights that sensors typically draw very little power and should not be wired in series with high-amperage devices.
  • Dest later clarifies that the sensor's grounding is critical for accurate readings, suggesting that it should be connected to a specific point in the circuit.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of adhering to conventional wiring practices and understanding basic circuit principles.
  • There is a suggestion that the circuit diagram lacks clarity and does not conform to standard schematic conventions, which could lead to misunderstandings about its operation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the circuit has significant issues and that the schematic is unclear. However, there is no consensus on the specific corrections needed or the overall feasibility of the design as presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions about current draw and wiring configurations, indicating that the circuit's design may not align with standard practices. The discussion also reflects a mix of theoretical and practical considerations, particularly in the context of automotive applications.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for hobbyists, students, or anyone interested in circuit design, particularly in automotive contexts, as it highlights common pitfalls in schematic representation and the importance of grounding and wiring conventions.

Destynn
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hey Guys,

Can you see what is wrong with this circuit?

It looks fine to me but I am being told that it is incorrect and will not work. I am pretty sure I am wrong and am willing to ask for help in understanding why this wouldn't work.

Please see attached picture for further info and any resistances that haven't been provided should be negligible to solving this.

Thanks,
Dest
 

Attachments

  • Circuit sketch.png
    Circuit sketch.png
    9 KB · Views: 590
Engineering news on Phys.org
Destynn said:
Hey Guys,

Can you see what is wrong with this circuit?

It looks fine to me but I am being told that it is incorrect and will not work. I am pretty sure I am wrong and am willing to ask for help in understanding why this wouldn't work.

Please see attached picture for further info and any resistances that haven't been provided should be negligible to solving this.

Thanks,
Dest

Welcome to the PF.

What is the context for this question? Is it for schoolwork? The schematic is drawn very unconventionally, and so it is difficult to understand what the connections are. For example, are the right side 2 boxes that are consuming 25A each wired in parallel or in series?
 
Yes, it is unconventional and could be interpreted in several ways. How does the left hand controller get its supply? Sensors usually take very little power so what is happening there?
The electricity behaves very literally (it's dumb stuff, in the end) and doesn't know what you want it to do unless you wire it totally correctly so your diagram needs to be done very carefully.
 
This schematic is more theoretical for design before I build it in an automotive environment.

I have redrawn it in a hopefully more schematic in a more appropriate way.

To Berke- These are to be wired in series (as shown in my new attached picture).

To Sophie- The left hand controller "1" gets its input signal from the sensor (refer to first picture which names the power wires).
The sensor will either output high when the truck is moving fast, and low when the truck is moving slow.
I am basically being told that the resistance of the wires is important.

Thanks,
Dest
 

Attachments

  • Circuit sketch.png
    Circuit sketch.png
    3.3 KB · Views: 591
Destynn said:
This schematic is more theoretical for design before I build it in an automotive environment.

I have redrawn it in a hopefully more schematic in a more appropriate way.

To Berke- These are to be wired in series (as shown in my new attached picture).

To Sophie- The left hand controller "1" gets its input signal from the sensor (refer to first picture which names the power wires).
The sensor will either output high when the truck is moving fast, and low when the truck is moving slow.
I am basically being told that the resistance of the wires is important.

Thanks,
Dest

Several problems/issues:

1) No sensor draws 25 Amps.

2) You don't wire power consumers in series. You wire them with parallel power connections.

3) Is the "25A" that you show for the two controllers their maximum current draw possible, and they typically draw less?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Pretty much nothing makes sense about this circuit.

Electricity has a language all of its own.

Are they wired in series and parallel? Looks strange. The red wires with the main power thru them have no ohm rating? Strange again.

I would agree that 75 amps is pretty huge. What are you controlling...a "cruise control system"?
Is this actually in a truck or is it some type of simulation?

To the OP...divulge every piece of information there is so maybe this could be pieced together.

Are you in high school, college...or just a hobbyist in your basement?

Also, if you have 25 amps going thru .9 ohm wires...you just dropped almost 25 volts in three parallel branches. Can't happen with a source of 24 volts. Would not make any sense. You wouldn't have any power left to power your controllers. Or is the .9 ohms suggesting the entire load...that might actually make sense.
 
Last edited:
Actually I figured it out.

First of all I want to thank everyone for their time and efforts. I apologize as well for my lack of having enough information to explain it correctly.

I am just a hobbyist in the basement and this is mainly just a simulation for a "fake" system someone had me make up for educational purposes.

It turns out that the numbers of the currents/voltages/resistance were irrelevant but just to know that if C1 was pulling a very high amperage (ex:450A) and the sensor was pulling very little (ex:1A) why would this setup be incorrect?

The answer was that the sensor should have been grounded over by the negative edge of controller 1 aka to the left of the big stud point where everything is meeting up.

This would make it so that the signal coming off the sensor would have the correct ground reference and it wouldn't read a way different value.

Thanks for everything guys I hope I didn't make everyone's brain 'splode with my inability to explain my problem.

Dest
 
First of all, 450 amps requires a HUGE cable. Copper is expensive and heavy. Not to mention finding a battery to deliver that for more than a couple minutes would be tough. To even have an alternator deliver that much power would be expenisve and power robbing to a gas engine. 450 amps at 24 volts would rob your engine of rougly 15 HP for a controller! That's ridiculous. It might take 15 HP to run your air conditioner, but that is reasonable since an compressor takes lots of HP to turn.

2nd of all, controllers and sensors are small amperage devices that typically give signals to high amperage devices...like electric motors. By signals I mean they are basically giving a low voltage, low amperage signal to turn a device on or off for example. So why on Earth would you use 450 amps to do this in your application?

3rdly, your circuit diagram still doesn't make much sense. You need to go back and understand the basics of circuits a little better.

Look at this link and ones similar to it:
http://courses.ncssm.edu/apb11o/resources/guides/G21-5.circuit_multiloop_circuits.htm

The resistors shown are similar to your loads above. Except, it appears you have your loads at the nodes...whereas the resistors are inbetween the nodes (typical of wiring diagrams)

If you drawing had some internal wiring shown on the insides of the loads it might make more sense.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Destynn said:
Actually I figured it out.

First of all I want to thank everyone for their time and efforts. I apologize as well for my lack of having enough information to explain it correctly.

I am just a hobbyist in the basement and this is mainly just a simulation for a "fake" system someone had me make up for educational purposes.

It turns out that the numbers of the currents/voltages/resistance were irrelevant but just to know that if C1 was pulling a very high amperage (ex:450A) and the sensor was pulling very little (ex:1A) why would this setup be incorrect?

The answer was that the sensor should have been grounded over by the negative edge of controller 1 aka to the left of the big stud point where everything is meeting up.

This would make it so that the signal coming off the sensor would have the correct ground reference and it wouldn't read a way different value.

Thanks for everything guys I hope I didn't make everyone's brain 'splode with my inability to explain my problem.

Dest

I hope that person are not trying to "educate" live subjects. I can't think how you would input that design into any real simulator.
If you want to simulate or build more circuits then you really should study how people draw them. The net is full of examples of circuit diagrams and they nearly all have very common conventions. (Steer clear of Automotive circuits in manuals; they are often just plain loony. Drawing schematics is a precise language - just as precise as Maths and more so than regular English. Your diagram means so little that it is impossible to assess what it does, I'm afraid.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #10
I will take this as a learning lesson and will make sure to make things easier for next time.
 
  • #11
. . . . . . is the right attitude. Good lad.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
8K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
4K