Power Sign Convention: Confused? Get Help Here!

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the sign convention for power in electrical circuits, particularly focusing on the confusion surrounding current direction, voltage polarity, and power absorption versus supply. Participants explore theoretical aspects and practical implications of these conventions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion over the sign convention for power, noting that positive current entering the positive terminal typically indicates power absorption, yet questions arise when the solution shows negative power.
  • Another participant cautions about the polarity of the supply, suggesting that the direction of current may need to be reversed to align with the established conventions.
  • A participant questions whether the potential increases as current passes through the source and considers how changing voltage polarity might affect the situation.
  • It is proposed that the supply acts as an element supplying power, and if the calculated power is negative, it indicates that the current direction is opposite to the initial assumption.
  • Participants discuss the implications of changing voltage values and how they relate to the sign convention, with one noting that a negative voltage would yield the same negative power result.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the definitions of elements in the circuit, with one participant realizing their initial assumptions about the roles of the components were incorrect.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the interpretation of the sign convention, as multiple competing views and interpretations of the roles of the elements in the circuit are presented. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct application of the sign convention.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the definitions of elements and the implications of current direction and voltage polarity on power calculations. There are unresolved assumptions regarding the roles of the components in the circuit.

merry
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

So the sign convention for power is really confusing me. According to my knowledge, if a positive current is entering the positive terminal of an element, the voltage drops across the element and power is hence absorbed. Why does the question solution change the sign of the current and say that the power is negative though? I am really confused =[
Help me please!

Thanks!


Attachment:
page 7 from Basic Engineering Analysis 9th Edition, by J. D. Irwin and R. M. Nelms.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1697.jpg
    IMG_1697.jpg
    18 KB · Views: 626
Engineering news on Phys.org
Be careful of the polarity of your supply. In picture 'a' the current would flow from the positive of the supply to the negative, so the direction given being 4A would need to be reversed to make sense, thus making the current -4A.
 
Is it because the potential increases as current passes through the source? Would it be the same if I changed the voltage to a negative 2?
I got confused because I assumed that the source would be supplying the current and hence the direction of the current makes sense, but I guess according to the passive sign convention, the voltage would then be negative (or the dir. of current would be reversed). Am I thinking the right way? @.@
 
The supply (blue thing) in this case is acting as an element, because of the direction of current, and the element (square) is supplying the power. We assume by convention that the supply is supplying power to the element, however in this case the power turns out to be negative, indicating the opposite.

If you assume current goes one way, and you get an answer with negative current, it means the current is actually going the other way. This is similar.

Is it because the potential increases as current passes through the source?

If you think of the supply as an element, and you increase the current through it (keeping the resistance fixed) what happens according to Ohms Law?

Would it be the same if I changed the voltage to a negative 2?

If you changed the voltage (in question a) to -2 (and swapped the polarity signs) you would have (-2V)*(4A) and would get the same -8W.

Yes, you are thinking the right way! You can assume anything you like, as long as you be careful about sign convention and write down what is valid, not what validates your assumptions ;). In the end, if you have the maths correct and the assumption wrong, you will just get a negative value, indicating the opposite of what you assumed.
 
ahh! =.= I assumed tht the blue thingy was defined as the element! and the box was the source/supply!

But it makes sense to think the same anyway xD Thanks so much for helping me out! I've been stuck at this question all day...
 
so like both are considered elements,

the right element is supplying power on both cases and the left element (blue creature) is absorbing power, also on both cases
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
12K
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
15K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K