Power System, synchronous generator

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a synchronous generator operating under specific conditions, including an increase in real power due to a drop in renewable energy supply. The generator's excitation voltage is 1.40 p.u., and it is connected to a network at 1 p.u., with synchronous reactance of 1.20 p.u. Participants analyze how reactive power delivery changes when the turbine input increases by 1% without a response from the excitation controller. They conclude that while reactive power (Q) remains constant with the increase in turbine input, the voltage (V_t) increase resulting from the rise in active power (P) will lead to an increase in reactive power delivered by the generator. The discussion emphasizes the interdependence of power and voltage in synchronous generator operations.
LagCompensator
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
Sorry for bad title(little informative regarding my question), however I came across the following question given as an exam question at some university.

Question:
"A synchronous generator is running overexcited with excitation voltage Ef = 1.40 p.u and connected to the network at voltage of 1 p.u. This generator has synchronous reactance of 1.20 p.u., and delivering active power of 0.50 p.u. to the network. In the network, there is 1% increase in real power due to power drop from uncontrolled network connected renewable power source. Therefore, the prime mover (i.e. turbine) input is increased by 1%. The excitation or voltage controller of synchronous generator is not responding to this change. Explain how the reactive power delivery from the synchronous generator will change under this condition"

So, the Q delivered by the generator per phase is:
Q = \frac{E_fV_t}{X_d}cos(\delta)-\frac{V_{t}^{2}}{X_d}-V_{t}^{2}(\frac{1}{X_d}-\frac{1}{X_q})sin^2(\delta) (1)
So according to this equation the Q will not change due to increase in turbine input.
However if we take a look at this equation:
P = \frac{E_fV_t}{X_d}sin(\delta)-\frac{V_{t}^{2}}{X_d}-V_{t}^{2}(\frac{1}{X_d}-\frac{1}{X_q})sin(2\delta) (2)
An increase of P will cause an increase in V_t, and an increase of V_t will increase the reactive power delivered by the sync. generator according to equation (1)

Can someone tell me if this is the right way of thinking or if I am missing something please tell me.

Best Regards
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes cnh1995
later after I've checked my phasor arithmetic...

seems to me Vt is fixed by network at 1.0 and this is a (Vexc-Vnetwork)/jXs question.
You're given the real component before and after.
 
@LagCompensator
I'll take a stab at this.
Being not a power system guy it'll be amateurish
but i hope logical.
As textbooks and teaching methods evolve, some things become so refined that we lose track of the lower parts of the learning curve.
LagCompensator said:
Question:
"A synchronous generator is running overexcited with excitation voltage Ef = 1.40 p.u and connected to the network at voltage of 1 p.u. This generator has synchronous reactance of 1.20 p.u., and delivering active power of 0.50 p.u. to the network. In the network, there is 1% increase in real power due to power drop from uncontrolled network connected renewable power source. Therefore, the prime mover (i.e. turbine) input is increased by 1%. The excitation or voltage controller of synchronous generator is not responding to this change. Explain how the reactive power delivery from the synchronous generator will change under this condition"

Okay , a picture might help us grunt this one out from the basics... I think in pictures not formulas.
Here's how i envision that circuit.
Circle at bottom is phasor diagram,
since we don't know power angle of the machine (angle of Ef) i just drew Ef some arbitrary place on a circle with radius 1.4.
syncgen1.jpg

What do we know ?
Vnetwork i assumed infinite bus since they gave us no network impedance value.
I gave it value 1∠0 so it'll be our reference for phasor diagram. Polar for 1∠0 is 1+j0 .

We know that Iline has real component 0.5 because power is 0.5 .
So it'll have imaginary component jVars.
I'll assume lagging current, so that'll be -jVars. If I'm wrong we'll just get a negative Var current. Iline = 0.5 -jVars

Ohm's law tells us voltage across Zline is Iline X Zline.

Kirchoff's voltage law tells us that
Vnetwork + Iline X Zline = Vf
but we have a lot of unknown angles...

Let's plug in what we know
Vnetwork + Iline X Zline = Vf
1+j0 + (0.5 -jVars) X (j1.2) = 1.4∠unknown
1 +j0.6 +1.2XVars = 1.4∠unknown
Aha !
Look back at the phasor diagram
we have a right triangle with adjacent side (1.0 + 1.2XVars) volts, opposite side 0.6 volts, hypotenuse 1.4 volts and no angles known.
Pythagoras let's us find adjacent side
(1.0 +1.2XVars) = √(1.42 - 0.62)
1.2 X Vars = 1.265 -1
so Vars = (1.265 - 1) / 1.2 = 0.2207

Repeating for real component of Iline = 0.51 i get 0.2159

That's the simplistic approach i'd use. If we worked numerous problems a shortcut would probably show its head..


Maybe some kind soul will improve(or correct) my explanation...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes cnh1995
Thank you, i'll take a closer look once I get home from work.
 
I am trying to understand how transferring electric from the powerplant to my house is more effective using high voltage. The suggested explanation that the current is equal to the power supply divided by the voltage, and hence higher voltage leads to lower current and as a result to a lower power loss on the conductives is very confusing me. I know that the current is determined by the voltage and the resistance, and not by a power capability - which defines a limit to the allowable...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K