MHB Practice Test Solutions: Derivation of [ -4/3, 1/3, 1 ] with Red Correction

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Test
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
View attachment 8987

Ok I didn't understand how he derived the

$\left[\begin{array}{c}-4/3\\1/3\\1 \end{array}\right]$

where the red correction is
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    31.7 KB · Views: 113
Physics news on Phys.org
For the rref form of $A,$ I get
$$A_{\text{rref}}=\left[\begin{matrix}1&0&4/3\\0&1&-1/3\\0&0&0\end{matrix}\right].$$
To find the null space of $A,$ you're essentially solving $A\mathbf{x}=0$ for $\mathbf{x}$. You can see that you have the equations
\begin{align*}
x+(4/3)z&=0\\
y-(1/3)z&=0
\end{align*}
to solve. One solution is $z=1, y=1/3, x=-4/3.$ Any multiple of this vector is also a solution, as $A(t\mathbf{x})=t(A\mathbf{x})=t\cdot 0=0.$

I'm not entirely sure the author's form of $A_{\text{rref}}$ is correct, but the null space calculation is correct.
 
ok couldn't see where the negative came from
 
Personally, I wouldn't have reduced the matrix. The null space is, of course, the set of all \begin{bmatrix}x \\ y \\ z \end{bmatrix} such that \begin{bmatrix}1 & 1 & 1 \\ 2 & -1 & 3 \\ -1 & 2 & -2\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}x \\ y \\ z\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix} x+ y+ z \\ 2x- y+ 3z \\ -x+ 2y- 2z\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix} which is the same as the three equations
x+ y+ z= 0
2x- y+ 3z= 0
-x+ 2y- 2z= 0.

Adding the first two equations eliminates y leaving 3x+ 4z= 0. Adding twice the second equation to the third also eliminates y and leaves the same 3x+ 4z. Any \begin{bmatrix}x \\ y \\ z \end{bmatrix} in the null space must satisfy 3x+ 4z= 0. Solve that for x: x= -\frac{4}{3}z. Then x+ y+ z= -\frac{4}{3}z+ y+ z= y- \frac{1}{3}z= 0 so y= \frac{1}{3}zs. Any vector in the null space is of the form \begin{bmatrix}-\frac{4}{3} \\ \frac{1}{3} \\ 1\end{bmatrix}z. We can take z= 1 and say that any vector in the null space is a multiple of \begin{bmatrix}-\frac{4}{3}\\ \frac{1}{3} \\ 1\end{bmatrix}.

(Some of use, who don't like fractions, might be inclined to take z= -3 and say that any vector in the null space is a multiple of \begin{bmatrix}4 \\ -1 \\ -3 \end{bmatrix}.)
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K