Predicting Beam Buckling: 5x5 vs. 6x6 with 1x1 Square Hole

  • Thread starter Thread starter GBA13
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around predicting which beam will buckle first between a 5x5 square cross-section beam and a 6x6 square cross-section beam with a 1x1 square hole removed from the center. The focus includes theoretical considerations of beam buckling, critical load calculations, and the influence of cross-sectional geometry on buckling behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the 6x6 beam with a hole will buckle second due to the analogy with hollow versus solid cylinders, despite both beams having similar dimensions.
  • Another participant emphasizes that predicting buckling behavior cannot rely solely on cross-sectional area, as factors like unsupported length, end conditions, and load eccentricities significantly affect the critical load.
  • A participant references Euler's formula for calculating critical buckling load, noting the importance of determining the second moment of area (I) for the cross sections involved.
  • One participant argues that the 6x6 beam, even with the hole, would have a greater weight compared to the 5x5, potentially affecting the buckling behavior.
  • Another participant counters that weight is not the primary concern for buckling; rather, it is the distribution of material around the centroid that matters.
  • A later reply indicates that calculations show the 6x6 beam has a greater second moment of area (I) than the 5x5, leading to the conclusion that the 5x5 may buckle first based on this analysis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the factors influencing buckling, with no consensus reached on which beam will buckle first. The discussion highlights multiple competing perspectives regarding the role of geometry, weight, and material distribution.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need to calculate the second moment of area for both beams, but the discussion does not resolve the implications of these calculations or the assumptions made in their analyses.

GBA13
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi, guys!

I am trying to work out with beam will buckle first, either a beam with a square cross section, 5x5 or a beam with a square cross section, 6x6 with a 1x1 square removed from the middle of the section.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Well I'm not really sure as they have the same dimensions in a way, 5 for the 5x5 and 6-1 for the 6x6. But I am think that as a hollow cylinder is stronger than a full cylinder, the 6x6 with a hole in the middle will buckle second.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You really can't say what will buckle first, just going by the cross section of the member. The unsupported length of the member, the end conditions, any eccentricities in the applied load all influence calculating the critical load beyond which buckling can be expected.
 
SteamKing said:
You really can't say what will buckle first, just going by the cross section of the member. The unsupported length of the member, the end conditions, any eccentricities in the applied load all influence calculating the critical load beyond which buckling can be expected.

Hi SteamKing,

Yeah I'm not given much expect those are the two cross sections of long and slender bars which are loaded in compression with a pin ended support. They are both subjected to the same force and are the same length.
 
GBA13 said:
Hi SteamKing,

Yeah I'm not given much expect those are the two cross sections of long and slender bars which are loaded in compression with a pin ended support. They are both subjected to the same force and are the same length.

The critical buckling load is given by Euler's formula:

F = π2E I / (K L2), where for pinned-pinned columns, K = 1.0

L = unsupported span
E = Young's modulus for the column material
I = second moment of area of the cross section

In calculating I, you must find the axis about which the second moment of area is a minimum. For sections which have axes of symmetry, the second moment calculated about one of those axes will have a minimum value, and this value must be used in Euler's formula.

You should be able to calculate the second moments for the two beam cross sections given in the OP and decide which figure gives the smallest second moment value.
 
correct me if I'm wrong but the 6x6 even removing the 1x1 core would outweigh the 5x5 increasing its total downward force on the span.
 
dragoneyes001 said:
correct me if I'm wrong but the 6x6 even removing the 1x1 core would outweigh the 5x5 increasing its total downward force on the span.

It's not a matter of weight, insofar as buckling is concerned. It's how the material in the cross-section is distributed around the centroid of the section.
 
So I calculated the second moment of areas and found that 6x6 one has a much greater I than the 5x5. So I think that from the formula that the 5x5 would bend first? Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K