Undergrad Predicting Motion of a Swing on a Non-Horizontal Branch

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on predicting the motion of a swing suspended from a non-horizontal branch, emphasizing that sufficient information is needed to specify the problem completely. Key factors include the positions of points C and D, the nature of the initial kick, and the mass distribution of the swing. The swing's motion can be analyzed using conservation of energy principles, with specific angles defined for the ropes relative to the coordinate axes. The initial kick is crucial as it determines the swing's starting position and energy. Overall, the approach appears to be on the right track for predicting the swing's motion.
{~}
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Do you understand swings?
swing.png


A swing is suspended from a non-horizontal tree branch. Points C and D are fixed in space. All 4 line segments in the diagram have constant distance. After some initial "kick" imparts energy to the system the only force acting externally on the system is gravity.

Is it possible to predict the motion of the swing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, if we have enough information to completely specify the problem. What are the four points and what is attached between them? Where is the “initial kick” applied and what force is it, applied for how long? How is the mass of the swing distributed?
 
AB is the seat. AC and BD are the ropes. CD is the branch. I assume the system remains under tension. The initial kick could be positioning the swing away from the minimum energy position then releasing. Mass is centered on the swing seat with some non zero moment of inertia.
 
I define ##\theta## to be the angle a rope makes relative to z and ##\phi## is the angle relative to x. The branch is in the xz plane. From conservation of energy I got
$$ \frac{r_A^2}{2} \left[\left(\frac{\partial\theta_A}{\partial t}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{\partial\phi_A}{\partial t}\right)^2\right]+ \frac{r_B^2}{2}\left[\left(\frac{\partial\theta_B}{\partial t}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{\partial\phi_B}{\partial t}\right)^2\right] - r_A\cos \theta_A - r_B\cos\theta_B = 0$$
Am I on the right track?
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
541
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K