Pressure on a vertical rectangular plate submerged in water

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the pressure force acting on a vertical rectangular plate, specifically a car door submerged in water. The scenario involves hydrostatic pressure and the implications of different methods for calculating the force exerted on the door at a depth of 10 meters.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different methods for calculating the hydrostatic force, including the "prism" method and the standard formula for pressure force. Questions arise regarding the correctness of the solution manual's approach and the implications of integrating pressure from different reference points.

Discussion Status

Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, with participants questioning the definitions and calculations presented in the solution manual. Some participants have provided their own calculations, leading to a discussion about the consistency of results and the mathematical principles involved.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing debate about the definitions of pressure and the integration methods used, as well as the implications of sign conventions in the calculations. Participants are also considering the effects of assumptions made regarding the setup of the problem.

Kqwert
Messages
160
Reaction score
3
The question goes as follows..:

A car driver has an accident and drives into a lake. The car sinks to the bottom. The distance from the car door to the water surface is 10m. The car door is 0.9m wide and 1.3m tall. Assume that the car door can be approximated as a vertical rectangular plate and that the car is filled with air.

A) Calculate the pressure force acting on the door

--------
The solution manual solves the problem by calculating the hydrostatic force halfway down the car door,

i.e. F = rho*g*(10+0.5*1.3) / 1.3*0.9

Isn't this wrong? My idea was to calculate the force by using the "prism" method, described here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pressure_prism
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello K, :welcome:

Well, do you get a different answer ?
 
Yeah, I get a different answer. I get ~122kN while the above mentioned formula gives ~89kN
 
Could you show the steps ?
 
After looking at the solution manual I believe that the author has just mixed up the definition of Pressure. By multiplying and not dividing the area on the hydrostatic force halfway down the car door I get the same answer as mine. I get 122kN by the way. I assume that is the correct answer? :-)
 
I get 122 kN too. A dimension check would have shown the / 1.3 in the expression can't be right.

Is it clear to you why the prism expression gives the same result as taking the pressure halfway ?
 
Nope, could you explain it? :-)
 
$$F = \int p\,dA = \int \rho g h \;d(w\times h) = \rho g w \int h \,dh = {1\over 2} \rho g w \left . h^2 \displaystyle \right |_{bot}^{top} =\\ {1\over 2 } \rho g w (h_{top}^2 - h_{bot}^2) = \rho g w (h_{top} - h_{bot}) {1\over 2 } (h_{top} + h_{bot}) = \rho g A\, h_{\rm average} $$
with ## A## the area, ##w## the width.
 
Thank you. In these expressions, what is htop and hbot?
 
  • #10
10 and 11.3 m, respectively :rolleyes:
 
  • #11
Thanks! I guess there generally will be no difference if you integrate the other way around - i.e. from top to bottom?
 
  • #12
Correct. If you integrate from bottom to top ##dA = w\,dh##, but if you integrate from top to bottom, then ##dA = -w\,dh## :cool:
 
  • #13
So you get a negative answer regardless?
 
  • #14
BvU said:
10 and 11.3 m, respectively :rolleyes:
Should that be -10 and -11.3 ?
 
  • #15
haruspex said:
Should that be -10 and -11.3 ?
As always, Haru is right ! I used ##dh>0## for #8, so I chose up as positive. As a consequence, ##g < 0## :rolleyes:

Kqwert said:
So you get a negative answer regardless?
Good remark -- My sloppiness..o:) (although with ##g<0## the answer is positive)

Leaves us the question: what is the meaning of a plus or minus sign.

##p=\rho g h## comes from ##\Delta p=\rho g \Delta h##, so ##p - p_{\rm surface} = \rho g (h - h_{\rm surface}) ## where we take ##h## and ##g## in the same direction ( you take the depth and use ##g > 0## or you take the height and use ##g < 0##.

As you know, ##F## is a vector ##\vec F## and ##p## is a scalar (a number without direction). Therefore ##dF = p \;dA## should in fact be written as ##\vec F = p\;d\overrightarrow {A}## and we need to establish coordinates. That means work and I try to avoid that ( -- except sometimes in the PF context --) . I know the force is inwards so I don't pay attention to the sign. I also know that the other door experiences the same force, but in the opposite direction. In this exercise, ##\| \vec F\| ## is the answer.

In #8 I should have written ##\vec F = \displaystyle \iint \ p \;d\overrightarrow {A} ## and the established coordinates would hopefully tell me the two force vectors for the two doors both point inwards.

I've forgotten the exact definition of ##d \overrightarrow A##, though... :confused:
 
  • #16
I guess dh becomes negative because you are integrating from a bigger number to a smaller number?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K