Pressure Required to Circulate Liquid in a Closed System?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the pressure requirements for circulating liquid in a closed system, specifically using a 3/4 inch PVC pipe with a pump over a linear distance of 30 feet and a head of 8 feet. It is established that pressure difference across the pump, rather than force, is the critical factor for achieving flow in a closed system. The conversation emphasizes the importance of considering friction and viscous dissipation when selecting a pump, as well as the potential for thermal siphoning to aid circulation without additional energy input. Participants also highlight the necessity of a header tank for accommodating thermal expansion and gas escape.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics principles
  • Knowledge of pump selection criteria
  • Familiarity with thermal siphoning concepts
  • Basic skills in system design and analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Pump System Curves and Head Requirements" to understand pump selection.
  • Learn about "Thermal Siphoning in Closed Loop Systems" for energy-efficient designs.
  • Study "Hydrodynamics of Closed Systems" to improve understanding of pressure dynamics.
  • Explore "Designing Header Tanks for Thermal Expansion" to ensure system safety and efficiency.
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, designers, and hobbyists involved in fluid dynamics, pump selection, and closed-loop system design will benefit from this discussion. It is particularly relevant for those working on solar-assisted systems or similar applications requiring efficient liquid circulation.

  • #31
gmax137 said:
The analyses I have been involved in studied the natural circulation flow in a system with a heat source down low and a heat sink up high. A closed loop with pumps installed but not running.

We did this numerically with a computer program that divides the system up into ~50 "nodes" and solves mass, energy, and momentum conservation. This allows for temperature & pressure-varying physical properties (eg, density), and flow-dependent resistance, etc. as well as varying the heat input and removal rates.

It can be done by hand but you have to make simplifying assumptions.
I was just thinking there must be some base model, where the heat input establishes the thermal gradient in the water column, and a free convection within a column is creating the flow. Warm fluid is less dense and rises, cold fluid sinks. I can see this happening vertically, but it's harder to swallow that a bulk flow is established in a loop as if there were a pump circulating the flow. What is the base model for this is what I'm asking...its probably going to be complicated even with simplifying assumptions; whatever they may be.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Ah! So while the pump may need very little force to circulate water in the circuit ..... I see what you mean, ... without a pump, a thermal siphon generating heat transference on the downward link of the circuit is difficult to envision..... How could that happen?
 
  • #33
Steven Bolgiano said:
Ah! So while the pump may need very little force to circulate water in the circuit ..... I see what you mean, ... without a pump, a thermal siphon generating heat transference on the downward link of the circuit is difficult to envision..... How could that happen?
I'm imagining a single column joining a warm reservoir on bottom to a cold reservoir above. I can imagine a natural circulation occurring where heat is brought to the top cold reservoir by free convection in the column and is released to the environment in the top cold reservoir, that seems like it can have a steady state circulation. I can't see it happening with the hot reservoir on top, nor can I see it with two vertical columns establishing some kind of net clockwise\counterclockwise flow like a pump would provide around a loop.
 
Last edited:
  • #34
  • #36
gmax137 said:
The elevation difference has to be sufficient, otherwise the density difference between the "up leg" and the "down leg" won't be enough to overcome the flow resistance (friction, bends, change of area).
The flow velocity self regulates, as a slower fluid flow, has longer to heat, to a higher operating temperature, with a greater density change, resulting in a greater hydrostatic drive pressure difference.

A crude guide to the optimum arrangement of the components in a thermal siphon, is "Heat Rises".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gmax137
  • #37
erobz said:
It's pretty light in supporting theory, but it guess its legit if they are using it as a deep backup safety in nuclear plants. I still would like to see an analysis.
For a real plant the analysis is more sophisticated than these hand calcs. Also, the startup testing done during plant commissioning includes a natural circulation test to verify the analytical results. Plus, several plants in the US have lost forced circulation (loss of power to the coolant pumps). This causes an immediate shutdown of the reactor, so the flow requirement is much lower than that required at power.

But this is pretty far afield from the greenhouse unit discussed in the OP; the nuclear plant link was just a convenient place to find a schematic drawing of the basic configuration and the pressure balance equations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz
  • #38
gmax137 said:
But this is pretty far afield from the greenhouse unit discussed in the OP; the nuclear plant link was just a convenient place to find a schematic drawing of the basic configuration and the pressure balance equations.
It seems like the OP's system has the cold reservoir lower than the hot reservoir.
 
  • #39
erobz said:
It seems like the OP's system has the cold reservoir lower than the hot reservoir.
Part of the design optimisation process involves finding ways to invert that situation.
 
  • #40
I was hoping the OP would provide a schematic elevation sketch, I didn't take the time to figure it out from the video.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
49K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
874