Pressure Required to Circulate Liquid in a Closed System?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the pressure required to circulate liquid in a closed system, specifically focusing on a setup involving a pump and PVC piping. Participants explore the implications of pressure differences, fluid dynamics, and system design considerations, including the effects of friction and thermal siphoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants clarify that pressure, rather than force, is the critical factor for liquid circulation in a closed system.
  • There is a discussion about the importance of pressure difference across the pump, with some noting that any microscopic pressure difference can initiate flow.
  • Participants inquire about the specifics of the system, such as the type of fluid, desired flow rate, and overall system design, to provide more tailored advice.
  • One participant mentions that in a theoretical system, there may be no "force" added by the pump, while in a practical design, a necessary pump head exists for achieving a desired flow rate.
  • There are suggestions regarding the need for a header tank to accommodate thermal expansion and gas escape, as well as considerations for constructing a simple solution for such a tank.
  • Some participants express interest in the potential for thermal siphoning to facilitate circulation without a pump, questioning the effectiveness of check valves in the system.
  • Concerns are raised about the system's pressure and temperature management, with discussions about the implications of running the system at positive pressure.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the optimal approach to designing the system or the necessity of a pump versus relying on thermal siphoning. Multiple competing views regarding the importance of pressure, system design, and operational efficiency remain evident.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their understanding of fluid dynamics and the specific characteristics of their systems, indicating that further details are necessary for accurate guidance. The discussion also reflects varying levels of expertise among participants, which may influence their contributions.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in fluid dynamics, pump selection, and the design of closed-loop systems, particularly in applications involving thermal management and energy efficiency.

  • #31
gmax137 said:
The analyses I have been involved in studied the natural circulation flow in a system with a heat source down low and a heat sink up high. A closed loop with pumps installed but not running.

We did this numerically with a computer program that divides the system up into ~50 "nodes" and solves mass, energy, and momentum conservation. This allows for temperature & pressure-varying physical properties (eg, density), and flow-dependent resistance, etc. as well as varying the heat input and removal rates.

It can be done by hand but you have to make simplifying assumptions.
I was just thinking there must be some base model, where the heat input establishes the thermal gradient in the water column, and a free convection within a column is creating the flow. Warm fluid is less dense and rises, cold fluid sinks. I can see this happening vertically, but it's harder to swallow that a bulk flow is established in a loop as if there were a pump circulating the flow. What is the base model for this is what I'm asking...its probably going to be complicated even with simplifying assumptions; whatever they may be.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Ah! So while the pump may need very little force to circulate water in the circuit ..... I see what you mean, ... without a pump, a thermal siphon generating heat transference on the downward link of the circuit is difficult to envision..... How could that happen?
 
  • #33
Steven Bolgiano said:
Ah! So while the pump may need very little force to circulate water in the circuit ..... I see what you mean, ... without a pump, a thermal siphon generating heat transference on the downward link of the circuit is difficult to envision..... How could that happen?
I'm imagining a single column joining a warm reservoir on bottom to a cold reservoir above. I can imagine a natural circulation occurring where heat is brought to the top cold reservoir by free convection in the column and is released to the environment in the top cold reservoir, that seems like it can have a steady state circulation. I can't see it happening with the hot reservoir on top, nor can I see it with two vertical columns establishing some kind of net clockwise\counterclockwise flow like a pump would provide around a loop.
 
Last edited:
  • #34
  • #36
gmax137 said:
The elevation difference has to be sufficient, otherwise the density difference between the "up leg" and the "down leg" won't be enough to overcome the flow resistance (friction, bends, change of area).
The flow velocity self regulates, as a slower fluid flow, has longer to heat, to a higher operating temperature, with a greater density change, resulting in a greater hydrostatic drive pressure difference.

A crude guide to the optimum arrangement of the components in a thermal siphon, is "Heat Rises".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gmax137
  • #37
erobz said:
It's pretty light in supporting theory, but it guess its legit if they are using it as a deep backup safety in nuclear plants. I still would like to see an analysis.
For a real plant the analysis is more sophisticated than these hand calcs. Also, the startup testing done during plant commissioning includes a natural circulation test to verify the analytical results. Plus, several plants in the US have lost forced circulation (loss of power to the coolant pumps). This causes an immediate shutdown of the reactor, so the flow requirement is much lower than that required at power.

But this is pretty far afield from the greenhouse unit discussed in the OP; the nuclear plant link was just a convenient place to find a schematic drawing of the basic configuration and the pressure balance equations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz
  • #38
gmax137 said:
But this is pretty far afield from the greenhouse unit discussed in the OP; the nuclear plant link was just a convenient place to find a schematic drawing of the basic configuration and the pressure balance equations.
It seems like the OP's system has the cold reservoir lower than the hot reservoir.
 
  • #39
erobz said:
It seems like the OP's system has the cold reservoir lower than the hot reservoir.
Part of the design optimisation process involves finding ways to invert that situation.
 
  • #40
I was hoping the OP would provide a schematic elevation sketch, I didn't take the time to figure it out from the video.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
49K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K