Pressurizing feed gas with venturi

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dgasman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gas Pressure
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on pressurizing feed gas, specifically a 10% ozone gas flow rate of 20 lpm injected into water with a flow rate of 120 GPM using a Mazzei Injector 784. It notes that the Mazzei data sheets do not specify the inlet pressure for the gas, leading to the assumption that it is at atmospheric pressure, with increased gas pressure potentially enhancing the gas flow rate. The conversation references the Chemical Engineers' Handbook, which discusses gas-in-liquid dispersions but does not mention venturi mixers, suggesting that alternative methods may be more effective. Porous septa, which allow for better control over bubble size, are proposed as a potentially superior option to venturi mixers. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of bubble size and mass transfer in optimizing gas injection methods.
Dgasman
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
I am looking into spme systems for injection of ozone gas into water. I am in no way an engineer, looking for some advice. Some systems Ive looked at pressurize the gas, whereas normally venturis use suction to pull the gas in. What is the effect of pressurizing this gas in terms of bubble size and mass transfer of gas into solution?

Does this make sense?
Gas flow rate: 20lpm
Gas: 10% ozone
Injected into water
Water flow rate: 120GPM
Mazzei Injector: 784
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The Mazzei data sheets do not list inlet pressure for the gas, so I assume that the gas is at atmospheric pressure. Increasing gas pressure will increase the gas flow rate.

As for bubble size and mass transfer, my old copy of Chemical Engineers' Handbook, 5th Edition, by Perry and Chilton has a section titled Gas-In-Liquid Dispersions that discusses exactly that. They do not mention venturi mixers, possibly because other methods work better. One of the methods discussed is porous septa, which are available in many different pore sizes. One of these might work better for you than venturi mixers because you have control over the bubble size. They are also sold to hobbyists as air stones for aquariums.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top