Pressurizing feed gas with venturi

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dgasman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gas Pressure
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on pressurizing feed gas, specifically a 10% ozone gas flow rate of 20 lpm injected into water with a flow rate of 120 GPM using a Mazzei Injector 784. It notes that the Mazzei data sheets do not specify the inlet pressure for the gas, leading to the assumption that it is at atmospheric pressure, with increased gas pressure potentially enhancing the gas flow rate. The conversation references the Chemical Engineers' Handbook, which discusses gas-in-liquid dispersions but does not mention venturi mixers, suggesting that alternative methods may be more effective. Porous septa, which allow for better control over bubble size, are proposed as a potentially superior option to venturi mixers. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of bubble size and mass transfer in optimizing gas injection methods.
Dgasman
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
I am looking into spme systems for injection of ozone gas into water. I am in no way an engineer, looking for some advice. Some systems Ive looked at pressurize the gas, whereas normally venturis use suction to pull the gas in. What is the effect of pressurizing this gas in terms of bubble size and mass transfer of gas into solution?

Does this make sense?
Gas flow rate: 20lpm
Gas: 10% ozone
Injected into water
Water flow rate: 120GPM
Mazzei Injector: 784
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The Mazzei data sheets do not list inlet pressure for the gas, so I assume that the gas is at atmospheric pressure. Increasing gas pressure will increase the gas flow rate.

As for bubble size and mass transfer, my old copy of Chemical Engineers' Handbook, 5th Edition, by Perry and Chilton has a section titled Gas-In-Liquid Dispersions that discusses exactly that. They do not mention venturi mixers, possibly because other methods work better. One of the methods discussed is porous septa, which are available in many different pore sizes. One of these might work better for you than venturi mixers because you have control over the bubble size. They are also sold to hobbyists as air stones for aquariums.
 
I have Mass A being pulled vertically. I have Mass B on an incline that is pulling Mass A. There is a 2:1 pulley between them. The math I'm using is: FA = MA / 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If MB is greater then FA, it pulls FA up as MB moves down the incline. BUT... If I reverse the 2:1 pulley. Then the math changes to... FA = MA * 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If FA is greater then MB, it pulls MB up the incline as FA moves down. It's confusing...
Hi. I noticed that all electronic devices in my household that also tell time eventually lag behind, except the ones that get synchronized by radio signal or internet. Most of them are battery-powered, except my alarm clock (which runs slow as well). Why does none of them run too fast? Deliberate design (why)? Wrong temperature for quartz crystal? Decreasing battery voltage? Or just a coincidence?
Back
Top