Probability Amplitude phases

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between the phase of probability amplitude and the classical action \( S \) in quantum mechanics, as articulated by Richard Feynman in "Quantum Mechanics and Path Integral." The phase is expressed as \( e^{iS/\hbar} \), which aligns with the Hamilton-Jacobi equation when substituted into the Schrödinger equation. This connection provides strong evidence supporting Feynman's path integral formulation, particularly highlighting that the Schrödinger equation can be derived from this framework. The discussion emphasizes the intuitive nature of path integrals and their foundational role in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the Schrödinger equation
  • Knowledge of Hamilton-Jacobi equation
  • Basic grasp of path integral formulation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Schrödinger equation from path integral formalism
  • Explore the Hamilton-Jacobi equation in detail
  • Read "Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell" by Zee for advanced insights
  • Investigate the implications of the classical limit as \( \hbar \rightarrow 0 \)
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focused on quantum mechanics, theoretical physicists, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of path integrals and their applications in quantum theory.

Frankww
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Quesion in approaching to Path Integral

I've just read "Quantum Mechanics and Path Integral" book which was written by Feynman, he said the phase of probability amplitude is proportional to "the ACTION S in units of Quantum of action \hbar. What is the reason to be that? Can anybody explain it to me physically? Thank you for all replies.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There might be a better answer than this, but one way to see it is to plug the wavefunction e^{iS/\hbar} into the Schrödinger equation and get an equation for S. The equation you get (to leading order in an expansion in \hbar) is just the (classical) Hamilton-Jacobi equation, where S plays the role of the classical action. This is very strong evidence in favor of Feynman's arguments.

In the end, I don't think there's an explicit "proof" that you should use the classical action in this way, just like there's no "proof" that the Schrödinger equation is correct - at the end of the day, you just ask if the equations are consistent with experiment (and the other descriptions of QM). And in this case, they are. In particular:

1. You can derive the Schrödinger equation from the path integral formalism.
2. There is a nice classical limit as \hbar\rightarrow 0.
 
Thank you very much for your answer. I'll review them, then.
 
Read the first few pages of QFT in Nutshell by ZEE

The motivation for introducing path integral formulation of QM is startted as
a doubt that feynmann had regarding the inteference of photon as it goes through a doble slit...
please read further

I cannot describe the hapiness that i fealt after reading those few pages.
I mean after reading it youll feel the basic idea of path integrals is so intuitive
and that anyone could think about that idea if just only he had looked beyond the box
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K