Undergrad Probability distribution of random events

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the probability of winning a lottery with a 1 in 1000 chance. Simulations indicate a 64.1% confidence of winning with 1000 tickets and 87.1% with 2000 tickets, prompting inquiries about the appropriate probability distribution. Participants clarify that "confidence" differs from "probability" and emphasize the need to define winning outcomes clearly. The conversation suggests that a binomial distribution may be more suitable for modeling the scenario, especially when considering multiple trials. Ultimately, the correct approach to find the probability of winning at least once is to subtract the probability of losing from 100%.
malawi_glenn
Science Advisor
Messages
6,735
Reaction score
2,434
Hi

Imagine we have a lottery, with chance of winning 1 in 1000 (1/1000). I have made computer simulations in order to find confidence levels for winning. At 1000 bought lottery tickets, the confidence of winning is 64.1% and 2000 bought lottery tickets the confidence of winning is 87.1%

By changing the chance of winning to 1/X, I have verified that there is always 64.1% confidence at X bought lottery tickets, and 87.1% confidence at 2X bought tickets.

Clearly, there must be a probability density function that describe these kind of events but I have failed at finding such in all of my textbooks at home. I was thinking about the Poisson distribution, but that just tell us the distribution of the number of wins for a certain number of bought lottery tickets.

I am only interested if a person wins or not, not how many wins they get. So, should I integrate the Poisson distribution from 1 to infinity? And if Poisson is the correct distribution, how to I figure out the "mean" from the chance of winning?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's easier to calculate the probability that all the purchased tickets lose.
 
drmalawi said:
At 1000 bought lottery tickets, the confidence of winning is 64.1% and 2000 bought lottery tickets the confidence of winning is 87.1%

If you mean "the probability of winning", you should use that phrase. In statistics, "confidence" has a different meaning than "probability".

You didn't define what you mean by "winning". Presumably you mean that you have at least one winning ticket.

You didn't define whether 1000 tickets each have different numbers. For example, in an actual lottery, if the goal is to buy at least one winning ticket, it would be best to buy 1000 tickets, each with a different set of numbers written on them, as opposed to buying 1000 tickets, each with a randomly selected set of numbers written on it - because if you buy randomly selected tickets, you might buy the same set of numbers more than once.
Clearly, there must be a probability density function that describe these kind of events but I have failed at finding such in all of my textbooks at home.

The probability space you have described has only two outcomes "I win" and "I don't win", so a probability distribution on that space involves only two probabilities.

If you wish to consider a probability space with a larger number of outcomes, you need to define the outcomes in that space. Perhaps your computer simulation is not actually a simulation of a lottery. It might be a simulation of M independent trials, where the probability of winning on each trial is 1/N. If an outcome is defined as winning on K of the M trials for K = 0,1,2..N then we have a binomial distribution. A binomial distribution can be approximated by a normal distribution or by a poisson distribution.

If the goal is only to compute the probability of winning on at least 1 of the M trials then take @Nugatory 's suggestion.
 
Ok I figured this one out. It was just to take 100% - P(not winning) :)
 
I don't understand, didn't you determine the probability was 1/1000? What are you estimating then, the number of wins after n trials?
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K