Probability of finding a pion in a small volume of pionic hydrogen

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the probability of finding a pion in a small volume of pionic hydrogen using quantum mechanics principles. The user proposes an integral approach to determine the probability, utilizing the wave function for the pion and considering the reduced mass of the system. Key calculations reveal that as the radius approaches zero, the probability approaches zero, indicating a need for a more nuanced analysis involving higher-order terms in the Taylor expansion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and wave functions
  • Familiarity with the concept of reduced mass in particle systems
  • Knowledge of integral calculus, particularly in three dimensions
  • Experience with Taylor series expansions and approximations
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the concept of reduced mass in multi-particle systems
  • Study the application of Taylor series expansions in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the properties of wave functions for different particles, including pions
  • Learn about probability density functions in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics, particle physics, and anyone involved in theoretical calculations related to pionic systems.

Mr_Allod
Messages
39
Reaction score
16
Homework Statement
Imagine the electron of a hydrogen atom has been replaced by a negative pion. Calculate the probability of finding the pion in a small volume near the nucleus of pionic hydrogen and compare it to the probability of finding an electron in the same volume for electronic hydrogen. Assume ##r << a_\pi## where ##a_\pi## is Bohr radius for pionic hydrogen.
Relevant Equations
Ground State Wavefunction: ##\Psi = \frac {1}{\sqrt {\pi}} \left (\frac {1}{a_0} \right )^{\frac {3}{2}} \exp \left [ \frac {-r}{a_0}\right ]##
Probability: ##P = \int_0^{\infty}\int_0^{\pi}\int_0^{2\pi} \Psi.\Psi^* r^2 \sin(\theta)dr d\theta d\phi##
Hello, I am trying to figure out the right way to approach this. First of all, other than the different Bohr radius value, does the change to a negative pion make any other difference to calculating the probability?

Also what would be the correct way to apply the "small volume"? What I'm thinking is I find the probability between ##r = 0## and ##r = R## where R is some radius much smaller than ##a_\pi## like so:

$$P = \int_0^{R}\int_0^{\pi}\int_0^{2\pi} \Psi.\Psi^* r^2 \sin(\theta)dr d\theta d\phi$$

With ##\Psi.\Psi^* = \frac {1}{\pi a_0^3}\exp \left [ \frac {-2r}{a_0}\right ]##

I would then follow a similar approach to finding the probability for the electron. Does this sound reasonable? Or should I be looking at some range of radii ##R_1 < r < R_2## where ##R_2 << a_\pi##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mr_Allod said:
I would then follow a similar approach to finding the probability for the electron. Does this sound reasonable? Or should I be looking at some range of radii ##R_1 < r < R_2## where ##R_2 << a_\pi##?
I would assume a small volume centred on the nucleus. Are you using the reduced mass of the system?
 
PeroK said:
I would assume a small volume centred on the nucleus. Are you using the reduced mass of the system?
So the original range ##0 < r < R## then?

For the electronic system I thought I would just use the mass of the electron since ##\mu \approx m_e##. Since a pion has a much greater mass than an electron I suppose I should use the reduced mass for the pionic system.
 
Mr_Allod said:
So the original range ##0 < r < R## then?
That's how I would interpret it.
Mr_Allod said:
For the electronic system I thought I would just use the mass of the electron since ##\mu \approx m_e##. Since a pion has a much greater mass than an electron I suppose I should use the reduced mass for the pionic system.
Exactly.
 
After having done the calculations I'm not sure whether I followed the right approach. What I have:

$$P = \int_0^R \int_0^\pi \int_0^{2\pi} \frac {1}{\pi a_0^3}\exp \left [ \frac {-2r}{a_0}\right ] r^2\sin(\theta) drd\theta d\phi = \frac {4}{a_0^3}\int_0^R r^2\exp \left [ \frac {-2r}{a_0}\right ] dr$$

$$=\frac {4}{a_0^3}\left[\frac {a_0}{4}(2r^2 +2a_0r+a_0^2)\exp \left [ \frac {-2r}{a_0}\right ] \right]_0^R$$

$$= \frac {4}{a_0^3} \left[\frac {4}{a_0^3} - \frac 1 4 (a_0^3 + 2Ra_0^2 + 2R^2a_0)\exp \left [ \frac {-2R}{a_0}\right ] \right]$$

Multiplying in the constant:

$$=1-(1+\frac {2R}{a_0} + \frac {2R}{a_0^2})\exp \left [ \frac {-2R}{a_0}\right ]$$

However when I take the approximation ##R << a_0## it simply leaves me with ##P = 1 - 1 = 0## and similar for the pionic hydrogen. Have I made a mistake somewhere in my analysis or should I try to find a different tactic?
 
Mr_Allod said:
Multiplying in the constant:

$$=1-(1+\frac {2R}{a_0} + \frac {2R}{a_0^2})\exp \left [ \frac {-2R}{a_0}\right ]$$
This all looks right.
Mr_Allod said:
However when I take the approximation ##R << a_0## it simply leaves me with ##P = 1 - 1 = 0## and similar for the pionic hydrogen. Have I made a mistake somewhere in my analysis or should I try to find a different tactic?
As ##R \rightarrow 0##, then ##p \rightarrow 0##. It's not zero for finite ##R##.
 
PS I get that the Taylor expansion for ##p## is zero up to terms in ##R^2/a^2##, so you need to expand up to terms in ##R^3/a^3##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
538
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K