Probability of finding a state with azimuthal orbital quantum number

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the probability of finding a quantum system in a state with an azimuthal orbital quantum number m=3, given the wave function \psi(\theta,\phi)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{30}}(5Y_4^3+Y_6^3-2Y_6^0). The probability is determined using the formula P=\sum_i||^2, where the dot product of the spherical harmonics and the wave function is essential. A key insight is that the coefficients of the eigenstates in the wave function directly indicate the probability associated with each state, negating the need for component resolution into spherical harmonics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically wave functions and quantum states.
  • Familiarity with spherical harmonics and their properties.
  • Knowledge of the expansion postulate in quantum mechanics.
  • Basic proficiency in LaTeX for rendering mathematical expressions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the expansion postulate in quantum mechanics for better understanding of state probabilities.
  • Learn about spherical harmonics and their applications in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the calculation of probabilities in quantum systems using different wave functions.
  • Review LaTeX formatting for mathematical expressions to ensure proper rendering in discussions.
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for the Physics GRE, quantum mechanics enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum state probabilities.

IHateMayonnaise
Messages
87
Reaction score
0
STATEMENT:

A system is known to be in the normalized state described by the wave function

\psi(\theta,\phi)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{30}}(5Y_4^3+Y_6^3-2Y_6^0)

What is the probaility of finding the system in a state with azmithual orbital quantum number m=3?WHAT I HAVE:

We know that:

P=\sum_i|<Y_i^3|\psi(\theta,\phi)>|^2

So, simply find the dot product of Y_i^3 and \psi(\theta,\phi). If we resolve this into the three components, this translates to:

Y_i^3 \dot \psi(\theta,\phi) = (y_1^3+y_2^3+y_3^3)\dot(5Y_4^3+Y_6^3-2Y_6^0)=(y_1^3)(5Y_4^3)+(y_2^3)(Y_6^3)-(y_3^3)(2Y_6^0)

How can I solve this dot product without resolving the components into the solutions to the spherical harmonics? Am I missing anything, any thoughts? Thanks yall

IHateMayonnaise

EDIT: either PF changed the format for LaTeX or I turned stupid. My first LaTeX statement, within tex brackets is: \psi(\theta,\phi)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{30}}(5Y_4^3+Y_6^3-2Y_6^0). Hmmm. The following is a test of theta:

\theta

which is (replacing []s with ()'s):

(tex)\theta(/tex)

And here is a copy/paste of the LaTeX code from another thread that IS showing up (in another thread, obviously not this one):

<br /> \alpha\beta\chi\delta\epsilon\phi\varphi\gamma<br /> &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Which for whatever reason copies withOUT the / in the tex bracket, but still does not render. Now I&amp;#039;ve got two problems..&lt;br /&gt;
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems there are some latex problems since the move to the new server. Greg is working on remedying it as quickly as possible, I'm sure.

In regards to your physics question:

You do not need to find any dot products here.

You need to find the total probability for the particle to have m=3, and you know the state of the particle is the some of a finite number of eigenstates. This is a direct example of the expansion postulate.

HINT: What do the coefficients of the eigenstates in the sum tell you?

P.S. This is from a practice Physics GRE, correct?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
678
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K