Probability of finding particle in 1D finite potential well

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the probability of finding a particle in a one-dimensional finite potential well, specifically focusing on the expression for the probability density function ψ(x) and its normalization. Participants explore the implications of normalization and the correct interpretation of probability in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the expression for probability and the conditions under which it holds, questioning the normalization of the wave function. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between normalized and unnormalized wave functions, as well as the implications of the probability being equal to 1.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various interpretations of the equations presented. Some have offered guidance on normalization and the relationship between different forms of the wave function, while others express uncertainty and seek further clarification.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the distinction between finite and infinite potential wells, and some participants mention the lack of specific examples in their resources related to unnormalized wave functions.

Ryomega
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



ψx is the function of postion for a particle inside a 1D finite square well. Write down the expression for finding the particle a≤x≤b. Do not assume that ψx is normalised.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



This is to check I'm not going insane:

P = ∫ lψxl2 dx = 1

Is that about right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So you're saying you will always find the particle between x=a and x=b? That's what a probability of 1 means.
 
Err... not sure why I typed in the "= 1" bit since I don't know what the probability is.
But you understood that the probability of finding the particle between a and b is expressed through my equation. So I rest my case.
 
Well, I wouldn't say I understood that's what you meant. I guessed that is what you probably meant. For all I know, you could have been writing down the normalization condition. What you wrote is too vague to be meaningful, and it isn't correct. Can you flesh it out a bit?
 
P = ∫ lψxl2 dx (integral from a to b)

This is the formal expression for probability of finding a particle within a boundary.

For normalisation, we say that the particle must be somewhere since we take the integral from -∞ to ∞.

1 = ∫ lψxl2 dx (integral -∞ to ∞)

Two totally separate equations.
 
Both of those equations hold only if the wave function is normalized. If the wave function isn't normalized, what would be the expression for the probability?
 
...the awkward moment when I don't know the answer has arrived.
Please illiterate.
 
Consider finding the average value of a function over its domain.

ave[f(x)] = ⌠f(x)dx / ⌠dx

Food for thought.
 
If you are given that the object is in an infinite square well, then of course there is a probability of 1 that it is in the square well. I would have expected the problem to ask for the probability distribution of its position in that well. You can get that by solving Shrodinger's equation.

Oh, dear! I just reread the title and realized it says finite well, not infinite"!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
So I'm getting... do a double integral or solve the schödinger equation or do a barrel roll.
Care to go a tiny bit further for me please?
 
  • #11
How do you normalize a wave function?
 
  • #12
square and integrate it. So... double integration and power of 4?
 
  • #13
That's given that the particle is between a and b and that isn't specified
 
  • #14
Ryomega said:
square and integrate it. So... double integration and power of 4?
I don't know what you're trying to say. Show your work so that your meaning is clear.
 
  • #15
∫∫ llψxl2l2 dx dx (inner from a to b, outer from -∞ to ∞)

seems strange...but that's what I'm imagining at the minute
 
  • #16
Let's say you have the unnormalized wave function ##\psi(x)##, and let ##\phi(x)## be its normalized counterpart. How are ##\psi## and ##\phi## related?
 
  • #17
-∞ to ∞ ∫ lψ(x)l2 dx = ϕ(x)
 
  • #18
The lefthand side of your equation is a definite integral, so the result is a number, not a function of x. Try again. Surely your textbook has an example.
 
  • #19
This is why I'm here, I've looked through 3 books and numerous sites and I can't seem to find this particular example where the wave function is NOT normalised.
 
  • #21
I've been reading this a while now and I finally understand what you were trying to teach me. Page two of the document shows that the normalisation process, of the wave equation. I see now, where I've been going wrong.

Thank you so much!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K