MHB Probability of Turning into a Bird

AI Thread Summary
A substitute teacher convinced kindergarten students that she would turn into a bird by the end of the day, prompting a discussion on the probability of this event. The consensus is that the probability of a human turning into a bird is zero, as there are no known mechanisms for such a transformation. The calculation supports this, showing that with only one possible outcome (remaining human), the probability remains zero. The conversation also touches on the challenges of understanding probability, suggesting that misconceptions may hinder learning in this area. Ultimately, the conclusion is that the event is impossible, reinforcing the concept of probability in this context.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Substitute teacher, Baraba Rose, convinced a class of kindergarden kids that she would turn into a bird before the school day ends. What is the probability that this event will take place?

Solution:

Let P = probability

P(turning into bird) = 0

The answer is 0 because human beings cannot turn themselves into birds or any other animal.

Correct?

Can an equation be set up for this question?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, there are zero known ways for a human being to become a bird, so we can simply say the probability here is zero. The total number of outcomes is one, and that is she will have not changed species on or before the end of the day, so there is only 1 possible outcome, thus:

P(X) = 0/1 = 0
 
I can see that probability is not easy.
 
RTCNTC said:
I can see that probability is not easy.
It looks to me like a large part of your problem with probability is that you keep telling yourself this.
 
HallsofIvy said:
It looks to me like a large part of your problem with probability is that you keep telling yourself this.

When the time comes, I will dive into this area of math a little deeper.
 
If "the time" has not yet come, why are you posting so many questions like these?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
125
Views
19K
3
Replies
105
Views
14K
Replies
77
Views
12K
Replies
87
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top