Probability question: From a group of 8 women, 6 men,

Click For Summary
A committee of 3 men and 3 women is to be formed from a group of 8 women and 6 men, with the condition that 2 specific men cannot serve together. The total number of committees without restrictions is calculated using combinations, specifically (8 choose 3) for women and (6 choose 3) for men. To account for the restriction, the solution involves calculating the valid combinations by excluding committees that include both restricted men. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using the combination formula correctly and highlights the need to consider the order of selection as irrelevant in this context. The overall goal is to determine the total number of valid committees while adhering to the stated restrictions.
Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12
Probability question: "From a group of 8 women, 6 men, ..."

Homework Statement



From a group of 8 women and 6 men, a committee consisting of 3 men and 3 women is to be formed. How many different committees are possible if [...] 2 of the men refuse to serve together?

Homework Equations



n choose k = n!/((n-k)! * k!)

multiplication rule


The Attempt at a Solution



Clearly the number of total committees that can be formed from 3 of 8 women and 3 of 6 men is (8 choose 3) * (6 choose 3). I need to subtract the number of those committees in which some arbitrary pair of men would've served together. Could someone please explain (or hint at) the logic involved in finding this?

OT link removed
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


I would do this: call the 6 men a, b, c, d, e, and f and assume, without loss of generality, that the two men who refuse to serve on the same committee are a and b. Then there are three ways to choose the three men to serve on the commitee:
1) Choose a but not b. Then we must choose 2 more men from the four, c, d, e, and f. There are 4(3)= 12 ways to do that.
2) Choose b but not a. As before, there are 12 ways to do that.
3) Choose neither a nor b to be on the committee. That is, we choose 3 out of c, d, e, and f. There are 4(3)(2)= 24 ways to do that.

There are, therefore, 12+ 12+ 48= 96 ways to choose the three men.

There are, as you say. "8 choose 3"= 8(7)(6)= 336 ways to choose the three women.
 


1) Choose a but not b. Then we must choose 2 more men from the four, c, d, e, and f. There are 4(3)= 12 ways to do that.
2) Choose b but not a. As before, there are 12 ways to do that.
3) Choose neither a nor b to be on the committee. That is, we choose 3 out of c, d, e, and f. There are 4(3)(2)= 24 ways to do that.

There are, therefore, 12+ 12+ 48= 96 ways to choose the three men.
I disagree here; order doesn't matter for any group of men, and as such the choose function should show up here.

As far as the OP's elimination method goes, again, order does not matter. How many 'illegal' committees are there? (Hint: think about how many more men there are to choose from, and how big a committee is.)

Alternatively, using the letter system, it's actually not unrealistic to enumerate all possible 'legal' combinations of three men (though I'll grant it's rather tedious).
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
8K