Problem integrating gamma ray absorption model

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the integration of a gamma ray absorption model, specifically the relationship between the thickness of shielding materials and the intensity of gamma radiation. The equation derived from the model is I = I0e^(-μx), where I0 represents the initial intensity of gamma rays, and μ is the proportionality constant. A participant clarifies the origin of I0 as the integration constant when the slab thickness is zero. The integration process involves using infinitesimal changes, represented by 'd', leading to the equation I = e^(-μX).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gamma ray physics and absorption principles
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Knowledge of exponential functions and their applications in physics
  • Basic concepts of radiation intensity and shielding materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the exponential decay formula in radiation physics
  • Explore advanced integration techniques in calculus
  • Research the properties of different shielding materials against gamma radiation
  • Learn about the applications of gamma ray absorption models in real-world scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, researchers in radiation safety, and professionals working with gamma radiation and shielding materials will benefit from this discussion.

d3ntr0n
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In this lab various thicknesses of a few materials are placed between a source of gamma radiation and a couple different detectors. It is reasonable to assume that some small change in the thickness of the shielding would produce a proportional change in the intensity of the gamma rays measured on the other side. If we define I to be the incident intensity of the gamma rays upon the shielding slab of thickness ΔX, and the emerging intensity on the other side of the shielding to be I’ with proportionality constant µ, we can describe the hypothesis with the simple model:

I) = -μΔX
I

According to the lab manual the solution to the integration of this equation yields

I = I0e^(-μx) ; Where I0 is the incident intensity

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
So for an infinitesimally small change delta, we would use the Latin 'd' giving

dI = -μdX
I

integrating both sides and exponentiating then yields

I = e^(-μX)

So where does the term I0 come from? Can someone show me where my error is?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When the slab thickness is zero there is an initial intensity. That corresponds to an integration constant.
 
Oh wow. Duh. Thank you gneill, I appreciate that.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K