Problem, Newton's 3rd Law Astronaut/Satellite

  • Thread starter Thread starter DantheMan10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving an astronaut and a satellite, where the astronaut exerts a force of 90 N for 0.46 seconds. The key equations referenced include Newton's 2nd and 3rd laws, as well as the impulse-momentum theorem, which states that impulse equals the change in momentum (I = Δp = FΔt). The correct approach to find the distance apart after 1.5 minutes involves calculating the velocities of both bodies after the force is applied and using kinematics to determine their positions over time. The final calculated distance apart is approximately 46.46 meters after 90 seconds, contrasting with an incorrect initial estimate of 193 meters.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's 2nd and 3rd laws of motion
  • Familiarity with the impulse-momentum theorem
  • Basic knowledge of kinematics and motion equations
  • Ability to perform calculations involving force, mass, and acceleration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the impulse-momentum theorem in detail
  • Learn how to apply Newton's laws to solve problems involving multiple bodies
  • Practice kinematic equations for objects in motion
  • Explore conservation of momentum in isolated systems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for problem-solving strategies related to Newton's laws and impulse-momentum concepts.

DantheMan10
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An 92.0kg spacewalking astronaut pushes off a 625 kg satellite, exerting a 90.0 N force for the 0.460 seconds it takes him to straighten his arms.


Question: How far apart are the astronaut and the satellite after 1.50 mins ?

Homework Equations



Newton's 3rd and 2nd law, and kinematics i guess


The Attempt at a Solution



I did F=ma to find the accel of the man and the sat, F = 90N for both of them because of Newton's 3rd law.

I then took that into the kinematics but I also took 90 (1.5mins) - the .46seconds and used that to find position with vi = 0 and accel = to what I found earlier. From there I took the same kinematic eq. pluged in what I got previous for the inital distance, turned accel to velocity and accel to 0 since now the guy and sat were no longer accelerating. I did this for both bodies and got approx 193m which is wrong.



Please tell me what I am doing wrong and/or how to implement the laws as needed. I already looked at a similar problem on here but all that was said is use the laws. But that person only offered the problem no attempt at the solution, so I am hoping my attempt will get me more noteworthy help. If you need me to I can scan my work, it however is not going to be pretty
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd start with the impulse-momentum theorem.
 
which is... I've read my book, haven't seen that in there or implemented, it may be called something different
 
There's no mention of it in your book? I'm not sure what else it would be called. It is based on Newton's second law.

I=\Delta{p}=F\Delta{t}

where I is the impulse, delta(p) is the change in momentum, F is the force, and delta(t) is the time interval the over which the force acts.

Think conservation of momentum.
 
I was under the impression that the impulse-momentum theorum, can be derived from N-2,3 and kinematics, in other words, the approach of the OP should work; eg

Vsat=a*t=90/Msat and Vast=a*t=-90/92 so Vsat=90/625*t and Vast=-90/92*t so the relative velocity apart from each other is
90(1/625+1/92)*t= 1.12*0.46=0.52m/s; 90 seconds later, 46.46m apart. Not sure why this is so different than the 193 offered as none of the work is shown.
 
ok I'm going to go through this and try to understand it and I went through again and there is no impulse formula in my book...hmm.. but i do remember it now from HS phys. Thank you for the help so far guys
 
DantheMan10 said:
ok I'm going to go through this and try to understand it and I went through again and there is no impulse formula in my book...hmm.. but i do remember it now from HS phys. Thank you for the help so far guys

Dan,

did you reconcile your results with mine? Just curious. If you take the impulse/delta P approach you end up with
Force*time=M1V1+M2V2 for the two objects.
 
Last edited:
denverdoc, using the impulse theorem, I get the same answer you do.
 
I have yet to go completely over it, I have been working on Statics and Aerospace programming for the evening, I should get to it sometime tonight or tomm morning.

The only problem with this Force*time=M1V1+M2V2, is I do not have their velocities
 
  • #10
hage567 said:
denverdoc, using the impulse theorem, I get the same answer you do.

Hage for my own edification, can you tell me how you did it.
 
  • #11
denverdoc, I'll send you a PM.

Dan, I don't understand why you are subtracting the 0.46s from the 90s in your original post (assuming I'm understanding what you did). Can you show more of your calculation?
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
19K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K