Astronaut floats outside spacecraft

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the speed of a recoiling spacecraft after a 91-kg astronaut pushes off from it at a velocity of 0.195 m/s. The conservation of momentum is identified as the applicable principle, allowing for the relationship between the astronaut's and spacecraft's velocities to be established. The final velocity of the spacecraft is derived using the equation v2 = (v1 * m1 / m2), resulting in a speed of approximately -0.00566 m/s, indicating the direction of motion opposite to that of the astronaut.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Laws of Motion
  • Familiarity with conservation of momentum principles
  • Basic kinematic equations, specifically Vf = Vi + aΔt
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the conservation of momentum in closed systems
  • Learn about Newton's Third Law and its applications
  • Explore kinematic equations in detail, focusing on their derivations
  • Practice problems involving forces and motion in two-body systems
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of motion in space environments.

  • #31
gneill said:
You can simplify further. And you've lost "v1" this time.

Sorry, again.
v2 = ((v1/Δt) * m1/m2)*Δt

Would that simplify to v2 = ((v) * m1/m2) ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Yes, but you've still used v instead of v1.

You can now proceed to replace variables with their numeric values and obtain a value for v2.
 
  • #33
Alright! v2 = ((v1) * m1/m2)

ends up becoming

v2 = ((-0.195) * (91/3131)

which would make v2 to equal ; -0.00566 ?
 
  • #34
We dealt with the magnitudes of the velocities during the derivation (no mention of signs designating directions), so at this point it's better to drop the sign on v1 for the calculation of v2, and then assign them both appropriate signs afterwards depending upon your choice of coordinate system if required. However...

I note that the question is asking for speed, so you shouldn't need to specify direction (sign).

Your calculation looks okay, but you've not specified units for the resulting value. Keep in mind that a marker will likely deduct points or just mark the answer wrong if you leave off the units.
 
  • #35
Okay, would that be 0.00566 m/s^2?
 
  • #36
HJ^2 said:
Okay, would that be 0.00566 m/s^2?
Wrong units. What are the units of velocity?

Also, make sure that you keep enough digits through your intermediate calculation so that you can properly round the final result to the required significant figures. What was the next digit in 0.00566?
 
  • #37
gneill said:
Wrong units. What are the units of velocity?

Also, make sure that you keep enough digits through your intermediate calculation so that you can properly round the final result to the required significant figures. What was the next digit in 0.00566?
0.0055667., and the units are m/s
 
  • #38
HJ^2 said:
0.0055667., and the units are m/s
You've slipped an extra 5 in there. The units are correct.
 
  • #39
Wow, now it's just simple mistakes. Final answer; 0.005667 m/s. Thanks so much, I spent an unruly amount of time on such a simple problem.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
44
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K