Problem parameterising an off-center disk

  • Thread starter Thread starter Amaelle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Disk
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on parameterizing an off-center disk with a center at (0, 3/2) and a radius of 1/2. The correct equations derived include the Cartesian form (x - 3/2)² + y² = 1/4 and the polar forms r₁ = [3sinθ - sqrt(9sin²θ - 8)]/2 and r₂ = [3sinθ + sqrt(9sin²θ - 8)]/2. Constraints for r include positivity and ensuring that 9sin²θ - 8 is non-negative. The area of the disk is confirmed to be π/4, with specific integral ranges for θ determined by the conditions on sinθ.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polar coordinates and their relationship to Cartesian coordinates
  • Familiarity with the Quadratic Formula and discriminants in algebra
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions and their properties
  • Basic calculus concepts related to integrals and area calculation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of polar coordinates from Cartesian coordinates
  • Learn about the implications of discriminants in quadratic equations
  • Explore the properties of the sine function and its graph
  • Investigate methods for calculating areas of irregular shapes using integrals
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying calculus and algebra, as well as educators looking for examples of parameterizing shapes in polar coordinates.

Amaelle
Messages
309
Reaction score
54
Homework Statement
parametrisating an off center disk with a center o (0;3/2) and a raduis r=1/2
Relevant Equations
x=rcosθ
y-3/2= rsinθ
Greeting

(x-3/2)^2+y^2=1/4

x^2+y^2-3y+9/4=1/4
r^2-3*r*sinθ+2=0
Δ=9sinθ^2-1

r=[3rsinθ-sqrt(sinθ^2-1)]/2

is my approch correct?
thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Amaelle said:
Homework Statement:: parametrisating an off center disk with a center o (0;3/2) and a raduis r=1/2
Relevant Equations:: x=rcosθ
y-3/2= rsinθ

Greeting

(x-3/2)^2+y^2=1/4
This would be the Cartesian equation if the center were at (3/2, 0).
Amaelle said:
x^2+y^2-3y+9/4=1/4
r^2-3*r*sinθ+2=0
Perhaps you have a typo in the first equation of the circle. This equation looks OK.
Amaelle said:
Δ=9sinθ^2-1
No, your discriminant is wrong.
Amaelle said:
r=[3rsinθ-sqrt(sinθ^2-1)]/2
No. You are using the Quadratic Formula to solve for r. The expression on the right side should not include r.
Amaelle said:
is my approch correct?
thank you!
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: Amaelle
Mark44 said:
This would be the Cartesian equation if the center were at (3/2, 0).
Perhaps you have a typo in the first equation of the circle. This equation looks OK.
No, your discriminant is wrong.
No. You are using the Quadratic Formula to solve for r. The expression on the right side should not include r.
thank you

after correcting my mistakes we got
r1=[3sinθ-sqrt(sinθ^2-8)]/2 and r2=[3sinθ+sqrt(sinθ^2-8)]/2
but i go lost on how to choose the correct r because we have two constraints:
r must be positive and sinθ^2-8 also should be positive.

my other concern is how to choose the integral range for θ as we have an off center circle
 
This was your incorrect discriminant from post #1:
Amaelle said:
Δ=9sinθ^2-1

Amaelle said:
after correcting my mistakes we got
r1=[3sinθ-sqrt(sinθ^2-8)]/2 and r2=[3sinθ+sqrt(sinθ^2-8)]/2
Your discriminant is still wrong, but in a different way. The quadratic equation you're working with is ##r^2 - (3\sin(\theta))r + 2 = 0##. The coefficients are ##a = 1, b = -3\sin(\theta), c = 2##.
Amaelle said:
r must be positive and sinθ^2-8 also should be positive.
Before deterimining this, you need to get the correct equations for r.
 
yes so sorry it was a typo but still

Δ=9sinθ^2-8

r1=[3sinθ-sqrt(9sinθ^2-8)]/2 and r2=[3sinθ+sqrt(9sinθ^2-8)]/2
I'm still in the same confusion
 
Amaelle said:
yes so sorry it was a typo but still

Δ=9sinθ^2-8

r1=[3sinθ-sqrt(9sinθ^2-8)]/2 and r2=[3sinθ+sqrt(9sinθ^2-8)]/2
I'm still in the same confusion
Much better.
For the square root to produce a real number, we must have ##9\sin^2(\theta) - 8 \ge 0##. This places restraints on the possible values of ##\theta##. Also, the largest possible value of ##9\sin^2(\theta)## is 9, so the quantity in the radical is at most 1.

For ##r_1, r_2## to be nonnegative, work with the numerators of the two fractions, keeping in mind the previous restrictions on ##\theta##.

Amaelle said:
my other concern is how to choose the integral range for θ as we have an off center circle
What is the integral you're working with?
 
i want to compute the surface of the disk using the integral, and because the circle is off center i know i can't use [0. 2pi] and because we have constraint on theta because of the discriminant I'm confused
 
Amaelle said:
i want to compute the surface of the disk using the integral, and because the circle is off center i know i can't use [0. 2pi] and because we have constraint on theta because of the discriminant I'm confused
Do you mean the area of the disk? If so, then you already know that its area is ##\frac \pi 4##.

Let's take things a step at a time. What constraints are there on ##\theta##? You must have ##9\sin^2(\theta) \ge 8##, right?
 
sin(x)>2√2/3 or sin(x) <-2√2/3 x>70.52° or x<-70.52°
 
  • #10
Amaelle said:
sin(x)>2√2/3 or sin(x) <-2√2/3 x>70.52° or x<-70.52°
Look at the graph of the sine function. In the first arch, i.e., between 0° and 180°, won't ##70.53° < x < 109.47°## satisfy ##\sin(x) \ge \frac{2\sqrt 2}3##?

Regarding the two values of r produced by the Quadratic Formula, I suspect that the one with the + sign generates the upper half, more or less, of the disk, and the one with the - sign generates the lower part.
 
  • #11
Amaelle said:
i want to compute the surface of the disk using the integral, and because the circle is off center i know i can't use [0. 2pi] and because we have constraint on theta because of the discriminant I'm confused

The best parametrization of (x - x_0)^2 + (y - y_0)^2 \leq a^2 is <br /> \begin{split}x &amp;= x_0 + r\cos \theta,\\ y &amp;= y_0 + r\sin\theta \end{split} for 0 \leq r \leq a and 0 \leq \theta &lt; 2\pi.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K