Engineering Problem using Pulleys with Weight in Equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving pulleys, weight equilibrium, and the calculation of compression "C" in a mast and the angle "X" with the horizontal. Participants emphasize the importance of free body diagrams (FBDs) for isolating forces acting on the hanging weight and the mast. A potential error in the original diagram is noted, suggesting a misrepresentation of angles, which complicates the calculations. The correct approach involves using symmetrical tension values and component equations to determine the angle and compression accurately. Overall, the conversation highlights the necessity of clear diagrams and proper force analysis in solving equilibrium problems.
Tygra
Messages
55
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
Calculate angle of mast and the compression force in the mast
Relevant Equations
In the question
Dear all,

I have the following problem:

Screenshot 2024-10-30 230737.png

I need to find the compression "C" in the mast and the angle that the masts makes with the horizontal (X degrees).

I know that the tension in the ropes "T" are of the same magnitude on both sides of the pulley, but I am struggling with finding C and X.

Could someone help please?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2024-10-30 225617.png
    Screenshot 2024-10-30 225617.png
    5.3 KB · Views: 43
  • Screenshot 2024-10-30 230624.png
    Screenshot 2024-10-30 230624.png
    5.2 KB · Views: 46
Physics news on Phys.org
If nothing is moving, all forces are in balance.
What have you done so far in terms of free body diagrams?
 
Hi Lnewqban,

this is how I attempt the question:

Screenshot 2024-10-30 232846.png

When I do the final algebra, I am way off.
 
Tygra said:
Hi Lnewqban,

this is how I attempt the question:

View attachment 352905
When I do the final algebra, I am way off.
Please share a Free body diagram of the hanging weight, and a separate FBD of the mast.
 
Lnewqban said:
It seems that the original diagram shows the top 45° angle in error, as its reference should be a vertical line rather than C.
So are you saying they did this on purpose?

Can I ask, how you would attempt this question?
 
No, I don’t.
Yes, you can: a free body diagram would be my very first step.
 
Lnewqban said:
No, I don’t.
Yes, you can: a free body diagram would be my very first step.
So it must be a typo in the book? This problem is from a book.

Here is my free body diagram:

Screenshot 2024-10-31 124011.png


Is this correct?
 
Tygra said:
So it must be a typo in the book? This problem is from a book.

Here is my free body diagram:

View attachment 352917

Is this correct?
FBD of what? You isolate the hanging mass. Forces of weight ##W## and tension(s) ##T## act on it. You use it to find ##T## in terms of ##W##. Thats one FBD. The other is a Free body diagram of the member ##C##. You isolate the mast from the external surroundings. Tension forces, and reaction forces at the hinge should be shown. You use both component equations simultaneously to find the angle ##X##.
 
  • #10
Thank you. I have it now. I think I was making it more complicated than what it was.
 
  • #11
Tygra said:
So it must be a typo in the book? This problem is from a book.

Here is my free body diagram:

View attachment 352917

Is this correct?
Yes, it must be a typo.
Otherwise they would be giving away angle x as being 90° (45+45+90=180), which is an incorrect value.

In order to properly calculate T, you need to consider the “Y” formed by T, T and 5 kN.
In this case the “Y” is symmetrical and the value of T is the same on the left and the right sides, but it is not always that way.
Hope you have checked the example in the link previously posted.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
22
Views
6K
Back
Top