Constant string length question with pulleys

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics homework problem involving pulleys and a constant string length. Participants explore the implications of defining positive directions for displacements and tensions in the context of the problem, as well as how these definitions affect the equations governing the system.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents equations for the forces acting on three masses connected by a rope, noting the need for a constant rope length equation.
  • Another participant questions the definition of the distance measurement, suggesting that the way the length is defined can lead to different results.
  • A participant argues that a length does not have a direction, only displacements do, and emphasizes that the sum of displacements must remain constant for the rope length.
  • There is a discussion about the professor's answer being incorrect, with participants expressing differing views on the validity of their approaches to the problem.
  • One participant clarifies that the direction of positive axes for both displacement and kinematic equations must align, indicating a potential inconsistency in the original approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the correct formulation of the rope length equation and the definitions of positive direction for displacements and tensions. No consensus is reached on the correct approach, as multiple competing views remain.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of consistent definitions in the context of the problem, indicating that the choice of reference points and directionality may lead to different interpretations of the equations involved.

ual8658
Messages
78
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Given Ma = Mb =Mc and muk between c and the surface is 0.30
upload_2017-1-18_17-38-7.png

Homework Equations


(rope length) = constant
Maaa = Mag - T
Mbab = Mbg - 2T
Mcac = T - (mu)Mcg

The Attempt at a Solution


The equations I came up on my own and the answer key did as well. The problem is I also need an equation relating the length of the rope as constant. My convention is to measure the length of the rope in the direction of positive motion as defined by my equations.

In this case I make the assumption mass A and mass B accelerate down (the answer later gives B as negative indicating it goes up) and made that the positive direction. I also made going to the left positive for mass C.

The problem is when I go to write the rope length equation I get
Xa + 2 Xb + (X - Xc) = constant

and obviously differentiate to get the acceleration equation. I measured X as the distance from the right side to the pulley nearest C and thus X - Xc is the rope length between that pulley and C. This is so that I measure positive distances in the direction of positive acceleration.

The answer key simply lists the equation as
Xa + 2 Xb + Xc) = constant

with all other equations I gave as true.

Where am I picturing this wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The picture defines ##x_C## as increasing when the mass moves to the right. Of course, if you define things different from the problem you will get different results.
 
ual8658 said:
I measured X as the distance from the right side
How do you mean? Some arbitrary point fixed at the right side? But the string doesn't go there. It goes from the pulley to C, a distance XC.
ual8658 said:
My convention is to measure the length of the rope in the direction of positive motion
A length does not have a direction. A displacement has direction. X-XC can be a displacement of C, but that does not make it a component of the string length.
Take a very simple model, two blocks connected by one straight string, moving to the left at the same speed. Their displacements are in the same direction, so the sum will not be constant.
 
Orodruin said:
The picture defines ##x_C## as increasing when the mass moves to the right. Of course, if you define things different from the problem you will get different results.

Indeed it turns out the professor's answer was wrong. But thank you!

haruspex said:
How do you mean? Some arbitrary point fixed at the right side? But the string doesn't go there. It goes from the pulley to C, a distance XC.

A length does not have a direction. A displacement has direction. X-XC can be a displacement of C, but that does not make it a component of the string length.
Take a very simple model, two blocks connected by one straight string, moving to the left at the same speed. Their displacements are in the same direction, so the sum will not be constant.

I think I was trying to get at displacement.
 
ual8658 said:
Indeed it turns out the professor's answer was wrong. But thank you!
Would you mind elaborating. What you posted from the solution seemed correct.
 
Orodruin said:
Would you mind elaborating. What you posted from the solution seemed correct.

Of course. So if you do define the displacement to the right as positive, then tension will pull in the negative direction and friction works in the positive direction. Acceleration then must be assumed positive to the right. In my relevant equations, tension is assumed positive to the left despite direction being define positive to the right. The direction of positive axes for both the displacement (rope length) and the kinematic equations must match. The way I did it in my explanation is correct so long as the rope length equation is NOT

Xa + 2Xb + Xc = constant

but rather the one with the negative Xc.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K