(Mechanics) Pulley System Question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving an expression for the angle alpha in a pulley system and determining the initial horizontal and vertical forces at the attachment point of a bell rope to a plank. The context is a homework problem involving static equilibrium, with participants exploring various approaches to resolve the forces and angles involved.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in establishing an expression for alpha and the forces due to perceived insufficient information.
  • Another participant suggests that different values of alpha will lead to different plank accelerations, indicating a dependency on the angle.
  • It is proposed that alpha can be defined in terms of beta using known distances, with suggestions to use geometric methods such as the sine rule.
  • A participant questions whether it is reasonable to assume the tension T2 equals the weight of the bell (18 kg x gravity), with some agreeing that this assumption holds under static equilibrium.
  • There is a discussion about the equations and unknowns involved, with T2 identified as the weight but alpha, beta, and T1 remaining unknowns.
  • One participant mentions struggling to form a third equation despite attempts to use geometry, indicating a sense of frustration with the problem-solving process.
  • Another participant suggests taking moments about the attachment point to analyze the torques, noting the clockwise and counterclockwise torques involved.
  • There is a discrepancy in the values of a and b mentioned in different posts, with participants expressing preferences for certain values for clarity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the assumption of static equilibrium and the relationship between tension and weight. However, there is no consensus on how to derive the necessary equations or resolve the unknowns, indicating ongoing disagreement and uncertainty in the approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the information provided and the difficulty in forming a complete set of equations. There are also inconsistencies in the values of a and b mentioned, which may affect the clarity of the discussion.

koolitzb
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Derive an expression for the angle alpha and determine the initial horizontal and vertical forces exerted at the point of attachment of the bell rope to the plank.
The system is in static equilibrium
WnfKPnN.png
Both ropes are light ie negligible mass.
The point of attachment has been circled in red on the diagram
The pulley wheel diameter may be considered as negligible with the pulley wheel central pin being at the same height as the initial height of the plank. the distance between the pulley pin and the end of the plank is 3000 mm

Distance a = 3000 mm, b = 0.75 x a mm

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



f6reYeG.jpg

cYT1NPY.jpg
[/B]
Have tried resolving vertically and horizontally, but I believe there is not enough information to even establish an expression for alpha, yet alone the forces exerted at the point of attachment
Can someone please push me in the right direction as I have spent hours racking my brain.
 

Attachments

  • WnfKPnN.png
    WnfKPnN.png
    10.5 KB · Views: 1,907
  • f6reYeG.jpg
    f6reYeG.jpg
    43.9 KB · Views: 877
  • cYT1NPY.jpg
    cYT1NPY.jpg
    33.5 KB · Views: 804
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think they are asking you to solve for alpha. Different alpha's will result in different plank accelerations.
 
Sorry, forgot to mention the system is in static equilibrium, at the initial stage
 
Because a and b are known, you should be able to define alpha in terms of beta. Try drawing a dashed line up from the bell, and a second dashed line connecting the plank and pulley 3.

Or solve it as a side-angle-side? I can't remember the last time I did that...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave
jackwhirl said:
Because a and b are known, you should be able to define alpha in terms of beta. Try drawing a dashed line up from the bell, and a second dashed line connecting the plank and pulley 3.

Or solve it as a side-angle-side? I can't remember the last time I did that...

I managed to get an expression for alpha in terms of beta and the distances, using the sine rule.
However I still do not see how it would be possible to find the components of the forces exerted at the point of attachment

Is it reasonable to assume the tension T2 in the second string (to the right) is equal to the 18kg x gravity (the force due to the weight on the end of the rope)
I did not believe it was but I can not find any other methods of working it out
 
koolitzb said:
Is it reasonable to assume the tension T2 in the second string (to the right) is equal to the 18kg x gravity (the force due to the weight on the end of the rope)
I did not believe it was but I can not find any other methods of working it out
Given static equilibrium, that is a perfectly reasonable assumption. Otherwise, the mass would be accelerating.
 
jackwhirl said:
Given static equilibrium, that is a perfectly reasonable assumption. Otherwise, the mass would be accelerating.

Ok, thank you.

Even given this assumption, I do not see enough information provided to be able to work out the forces exerted at the point of attachment
 
What are your equations and unknowns?
 
jackwhirl said:
What are your equations and unknowns?
The two equations found from resolving vertically and horizontally, T2 is now known as the weight 18kg, however alpha, beta and T1 are still three unknown

NEW
I can not form a correct third equation, I have tried using the geometry but something always seems to be missing
 
  • #10
koolitzb said:
I managed to get an expression for alpha in terms of beta and the distances, using the sine rule.
What about this equation?
 
  • #11
jackwhirl said:
What about this equation?
Sp1vOib.jpg

Sorry, forgot to mention I tried using that equation using the sine rule and it didnt work out due to the arcsin of the sin. Either way I don't believe this is the correct way of going about forming the equation from the geometry
That is the equation I ended up getting at the bottom labelled 1.

Note:
Apologies for the different values, but it is the actual concept of how to form the equation I am concerned about rather than the answer
Different handwriting as me and my friend are both attempting to work on this and are both completely stuck
 

Attachments

  • Sp1vOib.jpg
    Sp1vOib.jpg
    38.5 KB · Views: 659
  • #12
Can you take moments about your red-circled point for the b rope?
The wieght of the bell is a CW torque and the T2 of the rope is an ACW torque. T1 acts through the pivot, so can be ignored.

This looks a simple problem, but like you I'm struggling. Moments seems the only remaining option.

BTW in post #1, a=3 m and b= 0.75a = 2.25 m, but in post #11, a= 2.666 m and b = 2 m. I prefer the values in #1, if you can choose!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K