Problem with Second Order Differential Equation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the second order differential equation (x'-t)x''-x'=0, with participants exploring various substitution methods and transformations to simplify the equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss substituting x' with p and x'' with p', leading to the equation pp'-p't-p=0. There are attempts to rearrange this into a recognizable form, with some questioning the nature of the terms involved and their derivatives.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes multiple interpretations of the equation, with participants offering insights into potential transformations and integrations. Some express confusion regarding the simplifications and the implications of integrating the derived expressions.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of participants struggling with the recognition of certain derivatives and the implications of their manipulations, as well as the challenge of integrating the resulting expressions. The original poster has reiterated their difficulties, suggesting a lack of clarity in the problem setup.

scienceguy288
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I am stuck and after several attempts, have made little progress.

Homework Statement



Solve: (x'-t)x''-x'=0

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the dependent variable x is missing. Therefore, I substitute x'=p and x''=p', giving me, pp'-p't-p=0. However, here I get stuck. If I try to rearrange to give me a Bernoulli form, I get p-(p/p')=t and then get -p'/p+1/p=1/t, which cannot be solved by setting w=y^(1-n) as this would equal 1.

Can anyone give me a push in the right direction from this ( pp'-p't-p=0) point on?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
pp' - (p't + p) = 0

The term in brackets is the derivative of something you can recognise? And so is the first term?
 
epenguin said:
pp' - (p't + p) = 0

The term in brackets is the derivative of something you can recognise? And so is the first term?

Still stumped. I don't recognize that as anything I have seen before as far as I know...
 
You don't recognise what when differentiated gives you pp'?

Then for the bracketed term, well to give you a product (p't) in it, the thing differentiated probably has to be a product. :wink:
 
epenguin said:
You don't recognise what when differentiated gives you pp'?

Nope...

epenguin said:
Then for the bracketed term, well to give you a product (p't) in it, the thing differentiated probably has to be a product. :wink:

I see that [pt]'=p't+p, but I don't see how that can help solve this...
 
[p*p]'=2*p*p'.
 
Dick said:
[p*p]'=2*p*p'.

Right, so [(y^2)/2)]'=pp'. I still don't see how that is helpful...Sorry for my thickheadedness, but I am just not seeing it...
 
pp' - (p't + p)=[p*p/2-pt]'=0. Are SURE you don't see it? Integrate both sides.
 
Dick said:
pp' - (p't + p)=[p*p/2-pt]'=0. Are SURE you don't see it? Integrate both sides.

Okay, so the left will become p/2(p-2t)+c. The right is the integral of a derivative, so it will become simply (p^2)/2-pt. After simplification this just results in 0=0, though?
 
  • #10
Just what sort of 'simplification' are you referring to? p isn't a constant. It's a function.
 
  • #11
Well, Integrating both sides will give us

p/2(p-2t)+c=(p^2)/2-pt
(p^2)/2-2tp/2+c=(p^2)/2-pt
((p^2)/2-pt)+c=(p^2)/2-pt
0=0
 
  • #12
I meant integrate both sides of [p*p/2-pt]'=0. What are YOU doing?
 
  • #13
(p^2)/2-pt=constant?
 
  • #14
scienceguy288 said:
(p^2)/2-pt=constant?

Yes, now solve for p.
 
  • #15
Alright, so we get p=t+/-Sqrt[tc+t^2], integrating that in terms of t to get x=(t (t + Sqrt[2 c + t^2]) + 2 c Log[2 (t + Sqrt[2 c + t^2])])/2 and x=(t (t - Sqrt[2 c + t^2]) - 2 c Log[2 (t + Sqrt[2 c + t^2])])/2
 
  • #16
Thanks for helping me, I finally got the right answer. Your advise was truly indispensable!
 
  • #17
scienceguy288 said:
I am stuck and after several attempts, have made little progress.

Homework Statement



Solve: (x'-t)x''-x'=0

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the dependent variable x is missing. Therefore, I substitute x'=p and x''=p', giving me, pp'-p't-p=0. However, here I get stuck. If I try to rearrange to give me a Bernoulli form, I get p-(p/p')=t and then get -p'/p+1/p=1/t, which cannot be solved by setting w=y^(1-n) as this would equal 1.

Can anyone give me a push in the right direction from this ( pp'-p't-p=0) point on?
I'm coming to this late and clearly Mark44 has given you sufficient help. But when I looked at that equation, I saw it as (p- t)p'= p or
[tex]\frac{dp}{dt}= \frac{p}{p-t}[/tex]

Now let y= p- t. Then dy/dt= dp/dt- 1 so that dp/dt= dy/dt+ 1 and p= y+ t. The equation becomes
[tex]\frac{dy}{dt}+ 1= \frac{y- t}{y}= 1- \frac{t}{y}[/tex]
which is separable:
[tex]ydy= -tdt[/tex]
so that [itex]y^2= -t^2+ C[/itex].

Now, go back to x: y= p- t= x'- t so that the equation is
[tex](x'- t)^2= C- t^2[/itex]<br /> <br /> [itex]x'= t\pm\sqrt{C- t^2}[/itex][/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K