Problem with the expansion of integration by parts

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the peculiarities of the integration by parts technique, particularly the expansion of its expression. The user notes that while expanding the integration by parts expression can lead to an infinite series of polynomials on the right side, the left side does not exhibit the same behavior. This raises questions about the standard notation and the implications of such expansions, suggesting that the observed phenomenon may stem from recursive properties rather than a true mathematical issue.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integration by parts
  • Familiarity with polynomial expressions
  • Basic knowledge of recursion in mathematics
  • Awareness of mathematical notation conventions
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore advanced techniques in integration by parts
  • Research the properties of infinite series in calculus
  • Study the implications of recursion in mathematical expressions
  • Examine standard notations in calculus for clarity
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematicians exploring integration techniques, and educators looking to clarify integration by parts concepts.

tade
Messages
720
Reaction score
26
I've come across this funny problem while messing around with integration by parts. Probably made a mistake somewhere.


In the integration of parts expression, it's possible to expand it further.






Plugging the second expression into the first, we get





I don't think this is standard notation, but it's better than writing out all the "violin holes". :smile:






Expanding ad infinitum we get




The problem is that it seems like we will get an infinite string of polynomials on the right hand side, but not on the left.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It may not actually be a problem, just a weird result from recursion.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K