Programming Jokes: Lame, Science & Math Jokes!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wrichik Basu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jokes Programming
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread centers around programming jokes, inviting participants to share humorous anecdotes and quips related to programming, coding, and the experiences of programmers. The scope includes various types of jokes, from puns to anecdotes, and touches on the culture surrounding programming.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant introduces the thread by suggesting a dedicated space for programming jokes.
  • Several jokes are shared, including puns about programming concepts and humorous takes on programmer behavior.
  • Some participants express confusion over specific jokes, particularly those involving programming syntax, indicating a lack of clarity or understanding.
  • There are references to the cultural aspects of programming, including the challenges and humorous situations faced by programmers in their work environments.
  • Discussions arise about the grammatical correctness of jokes, with some participants debating the use of adjectives versus adverbs in a humorous context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally share jokes and engage in light-hearted banter, but there are disagreements regarding the clarity and correctness of some jokes, particularly those involving programming syntax and grammar. The discussion remains unresolved on these points, with multiple interpretations present.

Contextual Notes

Some jokes rely on specific programming knowledge, which may not be universally understood, leading to confusion among participants. Additionally, references to grammar and syntax errors highlight the interplay between programming and language, but the exact nature of these errors is not settled.

Who May Find This Useful

This thread may be of interest to programmers, computer science students, and anyone who enjoys humor related to coding and programming culture.

  • #31
berkeman said:
I guess programmers are not very intelligent. Certainly their elementary English grammar needs tutorial help...
You're saying programmers aren't pro-grammar?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bob012345, berkeman and Borg
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
DaveC426913 said:
That why it's called a Poof of Concept.
:oldeek: I'd have thought, in this day and age, that it would very politically incorrect to refer to your executives as gay.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz and DaveC426913
  • #33
Hornbein said:
I get this sort of thing all the time on physicsforums. I ask a question. If they don't know the answer they say it's a dumb question.
Example pls?
 
  • #34
strangerep said:
Example pls?
I ain't going to make no trouble hea.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu
  • #35
strangerep said:
Example pls?
Let's keep this out of the jokes thread. These issues should either be reported in the Feedback section, or in private conversation with the moderation team.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phinds
  • #36
Wrichik Basu said:
Let's keep this out of the jokes thread. [...]
Oh, I dunno. Anyone who says (seriously) "that's a dumb question" deserves to be mentioned in a jokes thread. :angel:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre, Tom.G and DaveC426913
  • #37
strangerep said:
Anyone who says (seriously) "that's a dumb question" deserves to be mentioned in a jokes thread. :angel:

Many jokes are a stupid answer.
 
  • #38
1667921774874.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
  • #41
Wrichik Basu said:
When I first saw plumbing like this in a professionally installed water system for a zebrafish facility, I know I could do better with a home made system. Those companies are better now.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
  • #42
Borg said:
Actually not too different than the first computer I programmed.
1667947592028.png

And yes, BTW, this was the entire system. WYSIWYG.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sbrothy, Wrichik Basu, Borg and 3 others
  • #43
1668201973270.png
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Filip Larsen, jack action and DaveE
  • #45
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu
  • #46
DaveE said:
Can you show us the handshaking protocols?

At 1.08 (can't seem to get link to start at specified time on my phone, sorry).
 
  • #53
1668677741861.png


Sidenote: I started with QBASIC in school for three years, then moved on to Java (using BlueJ) for the next four years. For the last two years, I shifted to NetBeans at home, and that was a great boost to knowledge as I could quickly view documentation for every function and class. I think it is a good idea to start with languages like Java, where blocks are delimited by braces, rather than languages where an extra space can screw up your whole code, unless you are using an IDE.
 
  • #54
No Pascal?
 
  • #55
DrClaude said:
No Pascal?
He was under time pressure.

(Sorry, I know that's a physics joke.)
 
  • Haha
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: Not anonymous, berkeman, Wrichik Basu and 1 other person
  • #56
Ibix said:
He was under time pressure.

(Sorry, I know that's a physics joke.)
Lame jokes need no further categorizing :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix
  • #57
DrClaude said:
No Pascal?
No, I didn't learn Pascal. BASIC → Java. Thereafter, MATLAB + Python (latter in college, primarily for numerical computation in physics). Side by side Android, MySQL, and some basics in C for Arduino.
 
  • #58
Wrichik Basu said:
No, I didn't learn Pascal. BASIC → Java. Thereafter, MATLAB + Python (latter in college, primarily for numerical computation in physics). Side by side Android, MySQL, and some basics in C for Arduino.
I wasn't talking about you (why would you have learned Pascal?), but referencing the chart you posted. BASIC was my first language, but I would think that many of those who learned programming in the 1970's and 1980's would have started with Pascal.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu and berkeman
  • #59
DrClaude said:
I wasn't talking about you (why would you have learned Pascal?), but referencing the chart you posted.
Can we do write-in options?

Pascal - thought it was Wirth it.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Not anonymous and DaveE
  • #60
DrClaude said:
No Pascal?
Ibix said:
He was under time pressure.
Coincidentally, we have a new member who joined today, @Pascal pressure :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu

Similar threads

  • · Replies 421 ·
15
Replies
421
Views
43K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K