- 2,180
- 2,717
He was under time pressure.DrClaude said:No Pascal?
Lame jokes need no further categorizingIbix said:He was under time pressure.
(Sorry, I know that's a physics joke.)
No, I didn't learn Pascal. BASIC → Java. Thereafter, MATLAB + Python (latter in college, primarily for numerical computation in physics). Side by side Android, MySQL, and some basics in C for Arduino.DrClaude said:No Pascal?
I wasn't talking about you (why would you have learned Pascal?), but referencing the chart you posted. BASIC was my first language, but I would think that many of those who learned programming in the 1970's and 1980's would have started with Pascal.Wrichik Basu said:No, I didn't learn Pascal. BASIC → Java. Thereafter, MATLAB + Python (latter in college, primarily for numerical computation in physics). Side by side Android, MySQL, and some basics in C for Arduino.
Can we do write-in options?DrClaude said:I wasn't talking about you (why would you have learned Pascal?), but referencing the chart you posted.
DrClaude said:No Pascal?
Coincidentally, we have a new member who joined today, @Pascal pressureIbix said:He was under time pressure.
Vic 20 had Basic.DrClaude said:I wasn't talking about you (why would you have learned Pascal?), but referencing the chart you posted. BASIC was my first language, but I would think that many of those who learned programming in the 1970's and 1980's would have started with Pascal.
The IP layer involves an unreliable datagram delivery service rather than a reliable connection oriented delivery service such as TCP. As such, handshaking is not necessary.DaveE said:Can you show us the handshaking protocols?
Weighted fair queueing (WFQ) MAY be implemented using scales, as
shown:
__
_____/-----\ / o\
<____ _____\_/ >--
+-----+ \ / /______/
| 10g | /|:||/
+-----+ /____/|
| 10g | |
+-----+ .. X
===============================
^
|
=========
Carriers in the queue too long may leave log entries, as shown on the
scale.
++[[]][+[]]+[+[]]
evaluates to the string "10" in Javascript?And/or horrifying. Yet strangely fascinating. I feel a bit like this is a prototype of the Enki virus from Snowcrash (Edit: Or was Inanna the virus and Enki the cure? Can't remember.)jack action said:Not really a joke but still funny
So, trying to work this out:jack action said:Did you know that++[[]][+[]]+[+[]]
evaluates to the string "10" in Javascript?
+[]
is a trick where an empty list is coerced into a zero, right? So it's ++[[]][0]+[0]
. And the zeroth element of the first list is an empty list, so it's ++[]+[0]
. Then the increment operator coerces the empty list to a zero and adds one to it, giving 1+[0]
which then turns into a "10" via string concatenation for some reason...?++0 would have been funnier...Ibix said:I recall someone asking for confirmation that one is true and zero is false in C, to which some genius replied "1".
Was that at the Foo bar?Wrichik Basu said:
It's funny because it's true.Wrichik Basu said: