Projectile angle of approach and height of target?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the height of ring stands for a projectile launched from a cannon and the angle at which the projectile approaches them. Key parameters include a muzzle velocity of 4.11 m/s, initial vertical velocity (Viy) of 0.85 m/s, and a launch angle of 12 degrees. The projectile's trajectory is analyzed using kinematic equations to determine the height at which it will pass through the ring stands, factoring in the time it takes to reach them. There is uncertainty regarding the radius or diameter of the rings, which is crucial for adjusting the height of the stands to ensure the projectile passes through the center. Overall, while calculations indicate a possible height for the first ring stand, the lack of diameter information poses a challenge for precise adjustments.
kLPantera
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For my lab, I need to calculate the height of the ring stands so the projectile can pass through them; as well as the angle the projectile will come at them.

I have calculated/measured the following things:

Muzzle Velocity: 4.11m/s
Vix= 4.02m/s
Viy= 0.85m/s
Delta Y: 0.87 (since the cannon we are using is being shot off the counter top, it will be -0.87 when calculating)
Delta X: 2.07 meters
t = 0.5153 seconds
ax= 0
ay= -9.8m/s

What is given:

Angle the cannon is shooting at: 12 degrees
I also calculated the time and distance it will take for the projectile to reach each of the ring stands. There are 3 ring stands and they are placed at the same intervals

Homework Equations



I don't know how to find the height I need for the ring stands (3 of them) or the angle the projectile will come at them. At least I am unsure which formula to use.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To determine the height, use the equation Y=1/2 * ay * t^2 + Viy * t + Delta Y, using the time you calculated for the projectile to pass through each point. (Note, this will give you the point the projectile will pass through, so set the ring stands so that the center of the opening is at this height by adding the radius of

To find the angle, first you need to find the X and Y components of the ball's velocity, its x component should be Vix, and you can calculate its Y component with Vy= ay * t + Viy. Then all you need to do is use trig. to find the angle of the resultant vector: theta=Tan^-1(Vy/Vx)
 
radius of...? what?

When I use the equation Y = (1/2)ayt2+Viyt + Delta Y.

I calculated that the first ring stand is 0.5075 meters away from the counter we launch the cannon off of, and that it takes0.128825 seconds for the projectile to reach it.

So what I did was:

y = (1/2)ayt2+Viyt + Delta Y
y = (0.85)(0.128825) + (0.87)
y = 0.97

Is it possible for a cannon with a muzzle velocity of 4.11 m/s and a Viy of 0.5 and a Vix of 4.02 m/s to have the first ring stand that high?
 
I'm saying that you have to raise the ring stand above the height you calculated so that the projectile will go through the ring rather than hit the top of it, and to give it the best chance of getting through the ring, you want the projectile to go through the center. So you need to raise it by 1/2 its diameter.(see below)
xpog1y.png

.5 * ay * t2 + viy * t + Delta Y = Yt
.5 * -9.8m/s2 * (0.128825s)2 + .85m/s * .128825s + .87m = 0.8982 m
It looks like your math is a little bit off, but yes, it is possible.
 
Oh I understand now. However there is a slight problem, we are not told the radius or diameter of the ring on the ring stand. The only measurements we have is the Delta Y, and degree of cannon fire.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K