Projectile Motion Check + Good tutorial?

Click For Summary
A transport plane releases a parcel at an altitude of 300m while traveling at 50m/s, prompting a discussion on calculating the time of flight, speed of impact, and distance from the drop point to impact. The initial calculations indicated a time of 7.82 seconds for the parcel's flight, a speed of 54.2 m/s upon impact, and a horizontal distance of 391m. Clarifications were made regarding the initial vertical speed, confirming it is zero, while the horizontal speed remains at 50m/s. Misunderstandings about coordinate systems and directionality were addressed, leading to the conclusion that the initial calculations were correct. The thread also sought recommendations for effective tutorials on projectile motion and Newton's laws.
rudders93
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have this problem, but not solutions, and my answer looks wrong but I can't really see that I've done anything wrong. So I was wondering if someone could check:

A transport plane traveling directly at a steady speed of 50m/s at an altitude of 300m releases a parcel when directly above a point X on level ground. Calculate:
a) The time of flight of the parcel
b) the speed of impact of the parcel
c) the distance from X to the point of impact

(all assuming g = 9.8m/s^2

2. The attempt at a solution

So I drew a diagram. For a) i got:

x = 300m, a = -9.8m/s^2, u = o, t = ?
300 = \frac{1}{2}(-9.8)t^{2}
=> t = 7.82s

b) I got x = 300m, a = -9.8m/s^2, u = 0, v = ?
v^{2} = 0 + 2(-9.8)(300) \Rightarrow v = 54.2 m/s

c) x_{h} = 7.82 * 50 = 391 m

Now what I'm not sure about is did I do that correctly? and can I assume that initial velocity (u) is 0? And then the equations, they require me taking a square root of a negative number (which I can't do over the real number field) so can I modulate the number, or am I doing something wrong?

Also, could anyone recommend a good projectile motion / applications of Newton's laws problem solving tutorial on the net? I can't seem to find one :(

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You did one thing incorrectly. The initial speed of the package as it leaves the plane is not 0. Think about it. What would the speed of the package have to be in order to travel along with the plane?

Also your equations are making you take square roots of negative numbers because you're not using your coordinate system correctly. You let down be the negative direction but you said your box (which falls downwards) has a positive displacement. So you are contradicting yourself.
 
Hmm. But with the package, since the plane is flying steadily at 50m/s doesn't that mean that the initial vertical speed is 0?

And I see what you mean by the incorrect direction
 
rudders93 said:
Hmm. But with the package, since the plane is flying steadily at 50m/s doesn't that mean that the initial vertical speed is 0?

And I see what you mean by the incorrect direction

Ah yes the initial vertical speed is zero, I misread your equation since you used x's instead of y's. Sorry about that.

So your answers are indeed correct.
 
Ah kk, thanks!
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K