Projectile Motion Experiment: Results Too High?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The projectile motion experiment yielded an unexpected acceleration of 14.02 m/s² for the vertical component, significantly higher than the expected 9.8 m/s². This discrepancy is attributed to improper calibration of the motion tracker and the positioning of the reference object. To achieve accurate results, the reference object must be larger and centrally placed in the image. Additionally, the camera should be aligned perpendicular to the wall to minimize perspective distortion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of projectile motion principles
  • Familiarity with motion tracking technology
  • Knowledge of calibration techniques for experimental setups
  • Proficiency in using kinematic equations, specifically a = 2 * y(t) / t²
NEXT STEPS
  • Research proper calibration methods for motion tracking systems
  • Learn about the impact of camera angles on experimental accuracy
  • Explore techniques for selecting appropriate reference objects in experiments
  • Investigate common errors in measuring acceleration in projectile motion
USEFUL FOR

Students conducting physics experiments, educators teaching projectile motion concepts, and researchers utilizing motion tracking technology for accurate data collection.

burakyildiz
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Thread moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums
Hello everyone,
I have a homework about projectile motion experiment and I threw small ball over the table and ball did projectile motion at the end of the table and ı recording this motion on motion tracker and motion tracker gave me acceleration of y component of ball as 14.02 m/s^2. But it has to be 9.8 m/s^2 or at least 10 or 9 m/s^2. Why tracker gave me this results? Should i do the experiment again?

Ekran görüntüsü 2021-12-12 134042.png

Ekran görüntüsü 2021-12-12 133843.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Make sure your length calibration is accurate: Use a larger reference object, that is placed right where the trajectory is.

As a control: Use the vertical fall distance position y(t) and the equation: a = 2 * y(t) / t2
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Orodruin, berkeman, DrClaude and 2 others
What @A.T. said. You have chosen an object far off to the side of the image as reference. Ideally your reference should be in the middle of the image and quite large.

Furthermore, your axes look quite tilted in comparison to the objects. You want to position the camera at a right angle to the wall and pointing as straight at your experimental setup as possible to avoid artefacts arising from perspective.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
26K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K