Projectile Motion Experiment: Results Too High?

AI Thread Summary
The projectile motion experiment yielded an unexpected acceleration of 14.02 m/s² instead of the expected 9.8 m/s². Suggestions for improvement include ensuring accurate length calibration by using a larger reference object placed directly in the trajectory's path. Additionally, the vertical fall distance should be measured using the equation a = 2 * y(t) / t² for better accuracy. It's also important to position the camera at a right angle to the wall to minimize perspective distortion. Conducting the experiment again with these adjustments is recommended for more reliable results.
burakyildiz
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Thread moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums
Hello everyone,
I have a homework about projectile motion experiment and I threw small ball over the table and ball did projectile motion at the end of the table and ı recording this motion on motion tracker and motion tracker gave me acceleration of y component of ball as 14.02 m/s^2. But it has to be 9.8 m/s^2 or at least 10 or 9 m/s^2. Why tracker gave me this results? Should i do the experiment again?

Ekran görüntüsü 2021-12-12 134042.png

Ekran görüntüsü 2021-12-12 133843.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Make sure your length calibration is accurate: Use a larger reference object, that is placed right where the trajectory is.

As a control: Use the vertical fall distance position y(t) and the equation: a = 2 * y(t) / t2
 
  • Like
Likes Orodruin, berkeman, DrClaude and 2 others
What @A.T. said. You have chosen an object far off to the side of the image as reference. Ideally your reference should be in the middle of the image and quite large.

Furthermore, your axes look quite tilted in comparison to the objects. You want to position the camera at a right angle to the wall and pointing as straight at your experimental setup as possible to avoid artefacts arising from perspective.
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top