Projectile motion problem (find the angle) other ways?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a projectile motion problem involving a soccer player taking a penalty kick. The player aims to determine the angle at which the ball must be kicked to hit the upper bar of a goal from a distance of 11 meters, with the goal height set at 2.44 meters. The initial speed of the ball is given as 25 m/s.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods for finding the angle, including substituting known values into the trajectory equation and solving for the angle. Some express reluctance to solve the resulting quadratic equation, while others suggest alternative approaches such as using a graphing calculator to find zeros of the function.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants exploring different methods and questioning the assumptions behind their approaches. Some have offered hints and suggestions for simplifying the problem, while others are sharing their own experiences and insights into the algebra involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted reluctance among some participants to engage with the algebraic complexity of the problem, and the discussion includes references to potential simplifications that could avoid extensive trigonometric calculations.

powerof
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A soccer player is taking a penalty kick from a distance of 11 meters from a goal which is 2.44 m high (forgive the possible incorrect use of English, since I'm not a native speaker). Given an initial speed of the ball of 90 km/h (which is 25 m/s2) calculate the initial upward angle of the ball for it to hit the upper bar (i.e., have height = 2.44 after having traveled 11 m horizontally).

Homework Equations



The trajectory equation for [itex]x_0=y_0=0[/itex] (initial horizontal and vertical positions) is:

[itex]y = (tan\theta)x - (\frac{g}{2(v_0)^2 cos^2 \theta})x^2[/itex]

Some known constants in the above equation are:

[itex]v_0=25 m/s \ \ \ \ \ \ g = 9.81 m/s^2[/itex]

And obviously [itex]\theta\in(0,\frac{\pi}{2})[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



The straightforward way is to just substitute the known data in the main equation and solve for [itex]\theta[/itex]:

[itex]2.44 = 11(tan\theta) - (\frac{9.81}{2(25)^2 cos^2\theta})11^2[/itex]

But I'm lazy and I find solving for theta to be long and tedious (for me at least) so what I'm asking is:

Are there are any other ways for finding the angle in the mentioned problem besides the classic method I gave you?

I feel it's a long shot but I'm in no hurry and it doesn't hurt to ask. Also it doesn't necessarily have to be an easier method. Just post any you can think of.

Thanks for reading this and hopefully answering it.

Have a nice day! :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
powerof said:

Homework Statement



A soccer player is taking a penalty kick from a distance of 11 meters from a goal which is 2.44 m high (forgive the possible incorrect use of English, since I'm not a native speaker). Given an initial speed of the ball of 90 km/h (which is 25 m/s2) calculate the initial upward angle of the ball for it to hit the upper bar (i.e., have height = 2.44 after having traveled 11 m horizontally).

Homework Equations



The trajectory equation for [itex]x_0=y_0=0[/itex] (initial horizontal and vertical positions) is:

[itex]y = (tan\theta)x - (\frac{g}{2(v_0)^2 cos^2 \theta})x^2[/itex]

Some known constants in the above equation are:

[itex]v_0=25 m/s \ \ \ \ \ \ g = 9.81 m/s^2[/itex]

And obviously [itex]\theta\in(0,\frac{\pi}{2})[/itex]


The Attempt at a Solution



The straightforward way is to just substitute the known data in the main equation and solve for [itex]\theta[/itex]:

[itex]2.44 = 11(tan\theta) - (\frac{9.81}{2(25)^2 cos^2\theta})11^2[/itex]

But I'm lazy and I find solving for theta to be long and tedious (for me at least) so what I'm asking is:

Are there are any other ways for finding the angle in the mentioned problem besides the classic method I gave you?

I feel it's a long shot but I'm in no hurry and it doesn't hurt to ask. Also it doesn't necessarily have to be an easier method. Just post any you can think of.

Thanks for reading this and hopefully answering it.

Have a nice day! :smile:
Are you too lazy to solve a quadratic equation?

To get to that point will require using a couple of trig identities and doing some basic algebra.
 
Well, if you have a graphing calculator like a TI84, you might be able to plot the function and look for a zero.
 
SammyS said:
Are you too lazy to solve a quadratic equation?

To get to that point will require using a couple of trig identities and doing some basic algebra.
I guess someone should've told me that before playing with sines and cosines for half an hour. Anyway, I looked it up on the Internet (and this post is part of my 'research') and I suppose you're referring to this.

I'll have to admit that it would not have occurred to me to substitute 1/cos^2 with tan^2 + 1 but once you do that the rest is just algebra, as you say.

Thank you very much for the hint.
 
This could have been solved almost without any trig by considering the vertical and horizontal motions separately.
 
voko said:
This could have been solved almost without any trig by considering the vertical and horizontal motions separately.
This made me curious. How so?

Given: [itex]v_y = v_0 sin \theta \ \ \ \ \ v_x = v_0 cos \theta[/itex]

Vertical motion: [itex]y = y_0 + v_y t + \frac{1}{2}at^2 \ \ \ \ \rightarrow y = v_0 (sin \theta)t - \frac{1}{2}g t^2[/itex]

Horizontal motion: [itex]x = x_0 + v_x t + \frac{1}{2}at^2 \ \ \rightarrow x = v_0 (cos \theta)t[/itex]

How would you have solved it differently?
 
Stick with ##v_x## and ##v_y## till the end. When you find them, you will obtain ##\theta##, this being the only time you have to use trigonometry, but it will be of a most basic kind.
 
Shoot the monkey

Maybe this will also do?
 

Attachments

  • shoot the monkey.jpg
    shoot the monkey.jpg
    14.2 KB · Views: 646
I think powerof's equations are correct.
 
  • #10
I think this problem may be just inherently difficult.

To get a general formula for ##\tan{θ}##, make the substitution ##k = \frac{v_0^2}{g}##. After much algebra, a not too hideous formula results.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K