Projectile Motion Using Vectors

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the minimum average velocity of a projectile (a tennis ball) that must pass through a specific point (11.86, 3.47) while adhering to constraints related to its launch angle and the court dimensions. The context involves projectile motion using vector functions, particularly in a sports setting.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between launch angle, velocity, and the trajectory required to clear an obstacle while reaching a target point. Questions arise regarding the necessity of maintaining a velocity greater than 11.86 m/s and the implications of different launch angles on the projectile's path.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the mathematical relationships governing projectile motion, with various participants suggesting different formulations and considerations. Some participants question the assumptions made about the problem setup, while others propose alternative approaches to optimize the projectile's trajectory.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the initial height from which the ball is hit is not at ground level, which may affect the calculations. There is also a discussion about the implications of the player’s movement in response to the lob shot, which could influence the problem's realism.

  • #31
haruspex said:
It avoids the complication of the launch angle needing to change when you introduce the lateral motion,

Yes, and of the opponent’s position.
But the opponent is on the diagonal, so wouldn't his position remain the same?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
themethetion said:
But the opponent is on the diagonal, so wouldn't his position remain the same?
The position on the court is the same, but not the distance from the origin.
 
  • #33
haruspex said:
The position on the court is the same, but not the distance from the origin.
But the origin hasn't changed?
 
  • #34
themethetion said:
But the origin hasn't changed?
In your method in post #26, you started off by ignoring the width of the court. You treated the trajectory as being straight up one side of the court, baseline to baseline, with the opponent half way.
Changing it to a corner to corner trajectory increases the distance from the server to the opponent as well as from server to landing point.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: themethetion
  • #35
I am sure that you have the skills to work this out if you think clearly and work methodically, but after 34 posts you still seem to be struggling. I think there are two main reasons for the struggle. First you don't seem to have a mental image of the problem. The best way to get a mental image is to draw a diagram: do this and post it here, with everything labelled. Which brings me to the second problem: you have used non-standard and very confusing labels for things, in particular
themethetion said:
x is the velocity
Don't do this. Choose ## v ## for the initial velocity (actually it is speed, but let's stick with ## v ## because we all know we are talking about the magnitude of the velocity here), then you can use ## x ## instead of R_x and ## y ## instead of R_y. Now using ## g ## for gravity (always keep symbols in your workings, only substituting numbers in at the end to get an answer) we can rewrite
themethetion said:
R_x= x cos(θ)t and R_y= -4.9t^2 + xsin(θ)t
as ## x = (v \cos \theta) t ## and ## y = y_0 + (v \sin \theta) t - (\frac 1 2 g) t^2 ## (note I have also introduced ## y_0 ##, the initial height of the ball as I am sure the player is not hitting it off the ground). We can then use sensible labels for things like the distance to the baseline ## x_b ## and to the distance and height to clear the other player ## x_p ## and ## y_p ##. Mark these on your diagram.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: themethetion and nasu
  • #36
Is this some math exercise or do you want it to be of any actual use for tennis practice? Drag and Magnus effect due to ball spin are not negligible in the real world.
 
  • #37
FranzS said:
Is this some math exercise or do you want it to be of any actual use for tennis practice? Drag and Magnus effect due to ball spin are not negligible in the real world.
Not to mention that a lob may be hit from well behind the baseline and that most players don't remain statuesque at the net, but run backwards to hit a smash.
 
  • #38
PeroK said:
... most players don't remain statuesque at the net ...
... with their racquets raised up high like a present-day Statue of Liberty ...
 
  • #39
FranzS said:
Is this some math exercise or do you want it to be of any actual use for tennis practice? Drag and Magnus effect due to ball spin are not negligible in the real world.
PeroK said:
Not to mention that a lob may be hit from well behind the baseline and that most players don't remain statuesque at the net, but run backwards to hit a smash.
It's a math exercise that we must make as practical as possible to 'help inform players in performing a successful shot'.
 
  • #40
themethetion said:
TL;DR Summary: Using vector functions how can I find the minimum average velocity (something greater than 11.86m/s) of a ball if the launch angle is unknown and if I have a point that the object must travel through (11.86, 3.47)?
Not sure about vector "functions" as such but you can use:

$$ \vec{a}\times\vec{s} = \vec{v} \times \vec {u} $$

As @kuruman has elsewhere advised, minimum velocity corresponds to ##\vec{v}## and ##\vec{u}## being perpendicular. In this case, the above simplifies to:

$$gR = u\sqrt{u^2-2gh}$$ where R is the given x-coordinate and h the given y-coordinate.

Edit y-coordinate should be less one given the ball is hit from 1m above ground. See post #4.

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/3byo9fl9ha
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
26K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K