Projection of a on b when a, b are complex

  • Thread starter Thread starter johann1301
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Projection
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the projection of complex vectors, specifically how to compute the projection of vector a onto vector b when both are complex. The key formula involves taking the scalar product of b and the difference (a - a1), setting it to zero, and expressing a1 as a scalar multiple of b. The conversation highlights the importance of the order of operations in complex vector spaces, noting that the inner product is antilinear in the first variable and linear in the second. This leads to the conclusion that the projection of a onto b is given by the formula ⟨e_i,v⟩e_i, emphasizing the distinction from real vector projections.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex vector spaces
  • Familiarity with inner product definitions and properties
  • Knowledge of scalar products and their implications in projections
  • Basic concepts of linear algebra, particularly vector projections
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of inner products in complex vector spaces
  • Learn about the differences between linear and antilinear operations in projections
  • Explore the application of projections in quantum mechanics and physics
  • Review Khan Academy's resources on linear transformations and projections
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying linear algebra, particularly those interested in complex vector spaces and their applications in various fields.

johann1301
Messages
216
Reaction score
1
see figure: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_projection#mediaviewer/File:Projection_and_rejection.png

Im reading about projections of vectors. My book says nothing about what the projection a1 of a on b is when a and b are complex vectors.

To find the formula for the projection, one needs to take the scalar product of b and (a-a1) and set it to equal zero and set that a1 equals some number times b.

But since a and b are complex, doesn't it matter which order this is done in?

If both a and b are complex, do we get two different projections onto b from a ?

see this, about 9:30 minutes in: http://www.khanacademy.org/math/lin..._trans_examples/v/introduction-to-projections
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let ##V## be a complex vector space. Let ##\{e_i\}_{i=1}^n## be an orthonormal basis for it. I'll use the physicist's convention for inner products. This means that the inner product is linear in the second variable and antilinear (=conjugate linear) in the first. Let ##v\in V## be arbitrary. Now let's write ##v=\sum_i v_i e_i##, and then compute ##\langle e_i,v\rangle##.
$$\langle e_i,v\rangle = \left\langle e_i,\sum_j v_j e_j\right\rangle =\sum_j v_j \langle e_i,e_j\rangle =v_i.$$ This means that every ##v\in V## can be written as ##v=\sum_i \langle e_i,v\rangle e_i##. Now we can see that the projection of ##v## onto the 1-dimensional subspace spanned by ##e_i## is ##\langle e_i,v\rangle e_i##. It can't be ##\langle v,e_i\rangle e_i##.

Edit: I took a quick look at the video and saw that it's talking about the dot product in ##\mathbb R^2##. So you may not be familiar with notations like ##\langle x,y\rangle##. This is the standard notation for the inner product of x and y. An inner product is defined as a function that takes two vectors as input and gives you a number as output. (There's also a list of conditions that it has to satisfy). The dot product on ##\mathbb R^2## is such a function. So the dot product is a special kind of inner product.
 
Last edited:
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
919
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K