Proof about symmetric groups and generators

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the symmetric group Sym(n) can be generated by the elements x=(1,2,3,...,n) and y=(1,2) for natural numbers n≥2. The proof employs mathematical induction, starting with the base case of n=2, where Sym(2) is shown to be generated by x and y. The inductive step demonstrates that if Sym(k) is generated by x and y, then Sym(k+1) can also be generated by these elements, utilizing the representation of permutations as products of disjoint cycles and the inclusion of transpositions involving the element k+1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of symmetric groups and their properties
  • Familiarity with mathematical induction
  • Knowledge of cycle notation in permutations
  • Experience with transpositions and their role in group generation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of symmetric groups in detail
  • Learn about mathematical induction techniques in group theory
  • Explore cycle notation and its applications in permutations
  • Investigate the role of transpositions in generating symmetric groups
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying group theory, and anyone interested in the properties and generation of symmetric groups.

SuperSusanoo
Messages
7
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Let n>=2 n is natural and set x=(1,2,3,...,n) and y=(1,2). Show that Sym(n)=<x,y>

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Approach: Induction

Proof:

Base case n=2

x=(1,2)
y=(1,2)

Sym(2)={Id,(1,2)}
(1,2)=x and Id=xy

so base case holds

Inductive step assume Sym(k)=<x,y> where x=(1,2,3,4,...,k) and y=(1,2)

Show Sym(k+1)=<t,y> where t={1,2,...,k+1} and y=<1,2>

To prove the inductive step, I was thinking we have to use the fact that every b in Sym(k+1) can be represented as the product of pairwise disjoint cycles. I think that we can express $\lambda$ in terms of x
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: ##(1\;2\; \dots \; k\; (k+1)) =(1\;2\; \dots \; k)\circ (k \; (k+1))## - from right to left. So ##(k \; (k+1)) = (1\;2\; \dots \; k)^{-1} \circ (1\;2\; \dots \; k\; (k+1)) \in \mathcal{Sym}(k+1)## by induction and the fact that all permutations that doesn't involve ##k+1## are in
If you can show, that all other transpositions ##(i \; (k+1))## are in it, too, you're done. This is because you then can place ##k+1## in every position with an arbitrary fixed order of the other elements.
Remember that all transpositions ##(i \; j)## with ##i\, , \, j \, \leq \, k## are already in the group.

Edit: Plus the fact that ##\{ \pi \in \mathcal{Sym}(k+1) \; | \; \pi(k+1) = k+1 \} \cong \mathcal{Sym}(k) \subset \mathcal{Sym}(k+1)##
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K