Proof concerning similarity between matrices of Linear Transformations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the conditions under which two linear operators, S and T, on a finite dimensional vector space V can have the same matrix representation in different bases. The original poster attempts to prove that such bases exist if and only if there is an invertible linear operator U such that T = USU-1.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the relationship T = USU-1 and discuss how to demonstrate that the matrix representations of S and T in different bases are equivalent. There is a focus on clarifying notation and ensuring understanding of the concept of similarity between matrices.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on clarifying notation and suggesting ways to formalize the proof. Some participants are exploring the relationship between the transformations and their matrix representations, while others are questioning assumptions and definitions related to the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted concern about the clarity of notation used in the problem statement, as well as the understanding of the concept of similarity in the context of linear transformations and their matrix representations. Participants are encouraged to explain their notation to avoid confusion.

WiFO215
Messages
417
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Let V be a finite dimensional vector space over the field F and let S and T be linear operators on V. We ask: When do there exist ordered bases B and B' for V such that B = [T]B'? Prove that such bases exist only if there is an invertible linear operator U on V such that T = USU-1.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have a hand-waiving argument and am not too sure of what to do.

Assume that T = USU-1.

Multiplying both sides from the left by U-1.

You have U-1T = SU-1.

Now since S, U and T are functions, let's "plug in" a vector whose co-ordinates are from B', say Y.

U-1T (Y) = SU-1 (Y)

T will "act on" Y since it is from B' using its respective matrix and the U-1 will take it from B' to B after it has been transformed. On the right hand side, the vector Y comes in, gets converted to a vector in B by being "acted on" by U. Then it will be transformed by S. Now the two vectors on either side are equal to each other, so effectively, their co-ordinate matrices from B and B' will be equal and so [T]B' = B.

Apart from this vague line of thinking, I don't know where to start on a formal proof. Please and thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's probably not going to be clear to everyone what _B=[T]_B' means. You do mean the matrix of S in the basis B is the same as the matrix of T over the basis B', right?
 
I'm sorry. Yes I do mean the matrix of S in basis B and that of T in B'. I see that notation used in Hoffman and Kunze so I thought it was universal notation. My mistake.
 
There is no such thing as "universal" notation! Always explain your notation.

Remember that a linear transformation may have many different matrix representations for different bases. In fact, if two matrices are "similar" if and only if they represent the same linear transformation in different bases. Suppose v is a vector, let [itex]v_B[/itex] represent its column-matrix representation in basis B and [itex]v_{B'}[/itex] represent its column-matrix representation in basis B'. Can you show that [itex]T(v)_{B'}[/itex] and [itex]S(v)_{B}[/itex] represent the same vector?
 
Oh I see. You are saying S and T represent the same transformation in different bases as T = USU-1? So then I suppose I could show T[v]B' = S[v]B.

So this would be the proof:

Since T and S do pretty much the same thing, but only catch is they do whatever they do on different bases. So when you plug in vector V with respect to B' to T or with respect to B to S, you land up with the same vector. Since I land up with the same vector on either side, I can argue that the co-ordinate matrix of V with respect to B' multiplied with the co-ordinate matrix of T in B' is the same as the co-ordinate matrix of V with respect to B' multiplied by the matrix of S with respect to B.

Am I correct?
 
Anyone?
 
Just make you 'vague' line of thinking less vague. Pick a basis B=<b1,...,bn>. So Sbi=s_1i*b1+s_2i*b2+...+s_ni*bn. If S=U^(-1)TU, can you show the matrix of T is the same in the basis B'=<Ub1...Ubn>.
 
Hurray! Yes I can! Yes I can! Thanks Dick and Halls!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K