Proof divergence of vector potential = 0

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the divergence of the vector potential, denoted as $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r})$$, equals zero under the context of electromagnetic theory. The integral representation involves the current density $$\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{r'})$$ and the distance $$\mathbf{R}$$ between source and measurement points. Key steps include applying the divergence theorem and integrating by parts, leading to the conclusion that both terms vanish under reasonable assumptions. The divergence of the vector potential is not an inherent identity but a chosen condition for convenience in electromagnetic formulations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically divergence and curl operations.
  • Familiarity with Maxwell's equations and their implications in electromagnetism.
  • Knowledge of the Poisson equation and its solutions in the context of vector potentials.
  • Experience with integral calculus, particularly in evaluating volume integrals.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Poisson equation from Maxwell's equations.
  • Learn about the properties of vector fields and their divergence in electromagnetic contexts.
  • Explore the application of the divergence theorem in vector calculus.
  • Investigate the implications of choosing divergence conditions in electromagnetic theory.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, vector calculus, and mathematical physics. This discussion is beneficial for anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of vector potentials and their properties in electromagnetic fields.

grantdenbrock
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to show that $$\del*\vec{A(\vec{r})}=\frac{\mu}{4\pi}\int{\frac{\vec{J{vec\r'}}}{\vec{R}}}d\tau=0$$
where A is the vector potential and R refers to "script r" or (r-r') where r is source point of charge and r' is the measurement point. tau refers to a volume integral. I have tried many times now to show this by bringing del into the integrand using product rules and the fact that $$\delR=-\del'R'$$ but cannot make it equal zero. I am not sure if there is something I have overlooked or another method to use but any help or suggestions are much appreciated!

Homework Equations


del*R=-del'R' must be used at some point[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


My solution thus far goes like this (Sorry My latex is awful so I will just write out my method)
1) bring Del into the integrand
2) using product rule rule of dot products expand into 2 terms each with its own dot product
3) del*J' =0 since del operates on unprimed coordinates
4) J' del*1/R does not equal zero therefore integrand does not equal zero :/[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I should add that its divergence of A, meaning del dot A =0 . Also, I am aware of the other thread regarding this problem however that thread does not contain any useful information or attempt a solution.
 
From what you've said, you should be able to show that
$$ \nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{x}) = - \frac{\mu}{4\pi} \int \mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x}') \cdot \nabla' \left(\frac{1}{|\mathbf{x}- \mathbf{x}'|} \right) d\mathbf{x}'.$$
The next step would be to integrate by parts and argue that both terms vanish independently subject to reasonable assumptions.
 

You write "... r is source point of charge ..." but don't you mean "source point of current density"? The integral certainly looks like the magnetic vector potential, especially with the μ in it ... based on that assumption I offer the following:

∇⋅A
= 0 is not an identity. It is chosen as a convenience.
We define A as H = ∇ x A.
By Maxwell, ∇ x H = j (j = current density).
So j = ∇ x (∇ x A).
But by a mathematical identity, this can be rewritten as
j = ∇(∇⋅A) - ∇2A
So we choose ∇⋅A = 0, giving
2A = -j
i.e. the Poisson equation, the solution for which is your integral. BTW the denominator in the integrand should read |R|. You can't divide one vector by another, at least not to my knowledge.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
25K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K