Proof: Fibonacci Sequence Sums to Squares

  • Thread starter Thread starter Euler_Euclid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the sum of products of consecutive Fibonacci numbers equals the square of the last term in the sequence. The suggested approach is to utilize mathematical induction, leveraging the Fibonacci recursion formula for the inductive step. Participants express curiosity about whether alternative methods exist for the proof. The conversation clarifies that this is not a homework question. The focus remains on the mathematical proof rather than personal opinions.
Euler_Euclid
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
if a_1, a_2, a_3 .... belong to the fibonacci sequence, prove that

a_1a_2 + a_2a_3 + ... + a_{2n-1}a_{2n} = (a_{2n})^2
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you are familiar with mathematical induction then that's the way to go with this one. Using the recursion equation (a_{2n} + a_{2n+1} = a_{2n+2} etc) should let you make the inductive step fairly easily.

BTW. Is this homework ?
 
not at all!
 
Are you familar with mathematical induction?
 
Is there any other method other than this?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top