Proof for Closure of Vector Addition - Can You Help?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof of closure for vector addition within the context of tangent spaces in differential topology. The original poster questions the validity of their textbook's proof, which relies on the Leibniz rule for scalar functions. Contributors recommend starting with vector fields, as outlined in "Gauge Fields, Knots and Gravity" by John Baez and Javier Muniain, and suggest consulting "Topology and Geometry" by Bredon for a more rigorous understanding. The consensus emphasizes that vector fields form a vector space, leading to a clearer proof of closure for vector addition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and their properties
  • Familiarity with differential topology concepts
  • Knowledge of the Leibniz rule in calculus
  • Basic principles of vector fields and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of vector fields forming a vector space
  • Read "Topology and Geometry" by Bredon, focusing on section II.5
  • Explore the application of the Leibniz rule in vector calculus
  • Investigate the relationship between tangent spaces and vector addition
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying differential topology, vector calculus, and related fields, will benefit from this discussion.

dEdt
Messages
286
Reaction score
2
If the tangent space at p is a true vector space, then it must be that the sum of two vectors is itself a directional derivative operator along some path passing through p. I've been trying to prove that this is true without any luck.

My textbook "proves" that vector addition is closed by showing that when the sum of two vectors is applied to the product of two scalar functions, we just get the Leibniz rule. This argument seems really unconvincing to me.

Can anyone either justify the validity of my text's proof, or offer their own proof for the closure of vector addition?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dEdt said:
If the tangent space at p is a true vector space, then it must be that the sum of two vectors is itself a directional derivative operator along some path passing through p. I've been trying to prove that this is true without any luck.

My textbook "proves" that vector addition is closed by showing that when the sum of two vectors is applied to the product of two scalar functions, we just get the Leibniz rule. This argument seems really unconvincing to me.

Can anyone either justify the validity of my text's proof, or offer their own proof for the closure of vector addition?

In the book by John Baez and Javier Muniain, "Gauge Fields, Knots and Gravity", the authors say that the easiest way to go about it is to start with a vector field, which assigns a vector to each point in spacetime. You can easily(?) prove that vector fields form a vector space, and then (maybe?) the fact for vectors follows.
 
What book are you learning from? The proof you're asking for will be in every textbook on differential topology. If you're learning differential topology from a physics book then my best advice would be to do yourself a favor and learn it from a proper book on the subject. See, for example, section II.5 of "Topology and Geometry"-Bredon (bear in mind this book defines smooth manifolds by using sheafs but it's equivalent to the usual definition in terms of smoothly compatible charts).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K